0
Meta Analysis ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Gut & Microbiome Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Microplastics predominantly affect gut microbiota by altering community structure rather than richness and diversity: A meta-analysis of aquatic animals

Environmental Pollution 2024 24 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 75 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Zhaoji Shi, Fucheng Yao, Ziqiang Liu, Jiaen Zhang

Summary

A phylogenetically controlled meta-analysis of 63 studies across 31 aquatic species found that microplastics significantly alter gut microbiota community structure — with between-group distances 87.75% higher than within-group distances — even at environmentally relevant concentrations. However, microplastics did not significantly affect species richness or Shannon diversity, indicating structural reorganization rather than diversity loss.

Body Systems
Study Type Review

The impacts of microplastics on the gut microbiota, a crucial component of the health of aquatic animals, remain inadequately understood. This phylogenetically controlled meta-analysis aims to identify general patterns of microplastic effects on the alpha diversity (richness and Shannon index), beta diversity, and community structure of gut microbiota in aquatic animals. Data from 63 peer-reviewed articles on the Web of Science were synthesized, encompassing 424 observations across 31 aquatic species. The analysis showed that microplastics significantly altered the community structure of gut microbiota, with between-group distances being 87.75% higher than within-group distances. This effect was significant even at environmentally relevant concentrations (≤1 mg L). However, their effects on richness, Shannon index, and beta diversity (community variation) were found to be insignificant. The study also indicated that the effects of microplastics were primarily dependent on their concentration and size, while the phylogeny of tested species explained limited heterogeneity. Furthermore, variations in gut microbiota alpha diversity, beta diversity, and community structure were correlated with changes in antioxidant enzyme activities from the liver and hepatopancreas. This implies that gut microbiota attributes of aquatic animals may provide insights into host antioxidant levels. In summary, this study illuminates the impacts of microplastics on the gut microbiota of aquatic animals and examines the implications of these effects for host health. It emphasizes that microplastics mainly alter the community structure of gut microbiota rather than significantly affecting richness and diversity.

Share this paper

Discussion

Log in to join the discussion

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.