0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Insights into effects of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on organic carbon decomposition in different soil aggregates

Environmental Pollution 2024 32 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared how conventional polypropylene and biodegradable polylactic acid microplastics affect carbon decomposition in different sizes of soil aggregates. Both types of microplastics increased carbon dioxide emissions from soil, but the effects varied depending on particle type, concentration, and aggregate size. The study reveals that microplastics can alter soil carbon cycling at a fundamental structural level, with biodegradable plastics not necessarily being more benign than conventional ones.

Polymers

The impacts of microplastics on soil ecological functions such as carbon recycling and soil structure maintenance have been extensively focused. However, the mechanisms underlying the impacts of microplastics on soil carbon transformation and soil microbial community at soil aggregate scale have not been clarified yet. In this work, the effects and action mechanisms of traditional microplastic polypropylene (PP) and degradable microplastic polylactic acid (PLA) on carbon transformation in three sizes of soil aggregates were investigated. The results showed that both PP and PLA promoted CO emission, and the effect depended on the type and content of microplastics, and the size of soil aggregates. Changes in soil carbon stocks were mainly driven by changes in organic carbon associated with macroaggregates. For macroaggregates, PP microplastics decreased soil organic carbon (SOC) as well as dissolved organic carbon (DOC). These changes were reversed in microaggregates and silt and clay. Interestingly, PLA increased the SOC, DOC and CO emissions in bulk soil and all three aggregates with a dose-effect response. These changes were associated with soil microbes, functional genes and enzymes associated with the degradation of labile and recalcitrant carbon fractions. Furthermore, PP and PLA reduced bacterial community diversities and shifted bacterial community structures in both the three aggregates and in bulk soil. Alterations of functional genes induced by microplastics were the key driving factors of their impacts on carbon transformation in soil aggregates. This research opened up a new insight into the mechanisms underlying the impacts of microplastics on soil carbon transformation, and helped us make rational assessments of the risks and the disturbances of microplastics on soil carbon cycling.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Discrepant soil microbial community and C cycling function responses to conventional and biodegradable microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists compared how conventional polyethylene and biodegradable polylactic acid microplastics affect soil microbial communities and carbon cycling. Researchers found that the two types of microplastics had markedly different effects, with biodegradable plastics causing more changes to microbial community structure and carbon-related gene activity. The study suggests that biodegradable plastics, while designed to be more environmentally friendly, may still significantly alter soil biology.

Article Tier 2

Effect of different polymers of microplastics on soil organic carbon and nitrogen – A mesocosm experiment

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers found that adding polyethylene and biodegradable microplastics to agricultural soil altered carbon and nitrogen dynamics, with biodegradable microplastics having stronger effects on soil organic carbon decomposition and nutrient cycling than conventional plastics.

Article Tier 2

Biodegradable microplastics decreased plant-derived and increased microbial-derived carbon formation in soil: a two-year field trial

AI summary Read the abstract

A two-year field experiment compared the effects of conventional (polypropylene) and biodegradable (polylactic acid, PLA) microplastics on soil carbon cycling in agricultural soil. Researchers found that while neither plastic type changed total soil carbon levels, PLA microplastics significantly reduced plant-derived carbon (lignin) by 32% while boosting microbial-derived carbon, suggesting that "biodegradable" plastics still meaningfully alter soil biology and chemistry. This matters because it challenges the assumption that biodegradable plastics are environmentally benign once they break down in farmland.

Article Tier 2

Mechanism of polyethylene and biodegradable microplastic aging effects on soil organic carbon fractions in different land-use types

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared how polyethylene and biodegradable microplastics at different stages of aging affect soil organic carbon fractions across various land-use types. The study found that both types of microplastics altered soil carbon dynamics, but the effects depended on the plastic type, its degree of aging, and the specific land-use context.

Article Tier 2

Differential carbon accumulation of microbial necromass and plant lignin by pollution of polyethylene and polylactic acid microplastics in soil

AI summary Read the abstract

This study found that both conventional polyethylene and biodegradable polylactic acid microplastics changed how carbon is stored in soil. The plastics increased carbon from dead microbes while decreasing carbon from plant material, with most of the additional soil carbon coming from fungal remains. These changes to soil chemistry matter because they could affect agricultural productivity and the ability of soil to store carbon, with broader implications for climate and food systems.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper