0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Assessment of microplastic release from geofabrics used in erosion control at construction sites

Next research. 2026 Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Anyame Bawa Sadique, Anna Wrobel-Tobiszewska, Rachael Stitz, Thomas Rodemann, Gordon Williams

Summary

Construction sites using polyester geofabric for erosion control were found to shed an estimated 1.7 million PET microplastic fibers per rain event into nearby waterways, even when stormwater management systems captured more than 90% of particles. The study demonstrates that geofabrics — a largely overlooked source — can be a substantial contributor to urban microplastic pollution, and that existing best management practices are insufficient to prevent millions of fibers from reaching aquatic environments during each major rainfall.

Study Type Environmental

• Geo fabrics on construction sites increases MP generation and release to natural environments. • An estimated 1.69 × 10⁶ PET MPs per rain event shed from geofabric were discharged into the water body. • PET accounted for 28.8% of MPs, with peak concentrations at downstream (53.3%) and outlet (65.4%). • ATR-FTIR linked PET fibres in downstream and outlet samples to the geofabric material used at site. Microplastic (MP) pollution in urban environments is an emerging concern, yet limited data exist on contributions from active construction sites. This study investigated the abundance and characteristics of MP particles in stormwater, including their release from geofabric materials at a construction site following major rainfall events. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) emerged as the dominant polymer, accounting for 28.79% of the total MP load across all samples, followed by PP, PE, and PU. This dominance was due to its high concentration in downstream samples collected within the construction zone, where PET averaged 61.74 MPs/L and accounted for 53.33% of the MPs at that location. In comparison, the concentrations declined to 6.74 MPs/L at the outlet site. This reduction reflects the influence of stormwater management features such as sediment basins, riprap-lined channels, and vegetated strip filters, which retained more than 90% of MP particles. However, estimated event-based loads indicated that between 1.42 × 10⁶ and 4.60 × 10⁶ MPs/event (mean: 2.61 × 10⁶ MPs/event) were discharged to receiving waters, including approximately 1.69 × 10⁶ PET MPs/event derived from geofabric shedding. These findings demonstrate that even when stormwater best management practices (SBMPs) are implemented effectively, construction sites can be substantial sources of MP pollution. This study highlights the need for long-term monitoring, flow-based load estimations, and targeted improvements to SBMP design to minimise MP export and better manage pollution risks during rainfall-driven events. Keywords: stormwater, microplastic, construction sites, pollution, geofabrics

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

(Micro)plastics from erosion control engineering in China: Environment pollution and prevention strategies

This study highlights that erosion control engineering projects in China — which use large amounts of plastic mesh, bags, and geocells — are a significant but underrecognized source of microplastic pollution. As these plastic products degrade outdoors, they shed fragments that contaminate soil and nearby waterways.

Article Tier 2

Weathering of geotextiles under ultraviolet exposure: A neglected source of microfibers from coastal reclamation

Researchers found that UV weathering of geotextiles used in coastal reclamation projects causes significant microfiber release, identifying these widely used polymeric materials as a neglected source of microplastic pollution in coastal environments.

Article Tier 2

Analysis of the generation of plastic debris and microplastics from geosynthetics

This paper critically analyzes claims linking geosynthetic materials to microplastic generation, arguing that the environmental benefits of geosynthetics — such as preventing erosion and improving waste containment — far outweigh the minimal plastic debris they produce compared to alternative materials. The work is relevant to microplastic research by quantifying geosynthetics as a relatively minor source compared to other plastic pathways.

Article Tier 2

Quantifying shedding of synthetic fibers from textiles; a source of microplastics released into the environment

Researchers quantified the shedding of synthetic fibers from textiles during simulated washing, finding that fabric type, age, and wash conditions significantly affected fiber release, and establishing a quantitative basis for estimating textile-derived microplastic inputs.

Article Tier 2

Stormwater runoff microplastics: Polymer types, particle size, and factors controlling loading rates

Researchers characterized microplastics in stormwater runoff samples collected at urban outfall locations. The study identified 17 different polymer types across various storm events, with concentrations around 0.99 particles per liter for the 500-1000 micrometer size range, and found that rainfall intensity and land use were key factors controlling microplastic loading rates.

Share this paper