0
Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Microplastics in Wastewater Systems of Kazakhstan and Central Asia: A Critical Review of Analytical Methods, Uncertainties, and Research Gaps

Water 2026
María-Elena Rodrigo-Clavero, Rodrigo-Ilarri Javier, Kulyash K. Alimova, Natalya S. Salikova, Lyudmila A. Makeyeva, Meiirman Berdali

Summary

A systematic review of 63 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) worldwide — including the first integrated assessment of Central Asian facilities — found that secondary treatment removes a median 85.5% of microplastics from wastewater, while tertiary treatment reaches 95%, but concentrates vast quantities of microplastics in sewage sludge. Central Asian plants with only secondary treatment release effluent in the upper range of global concentrations, underscoring the need for upgraded treatment and better monitoring in water-scarce regions where treated water is often reused in agriculture.

Study Type Environmental

Microplastics are increasingly recognized as contaminants of emerging concern in wastewater systems, where treatment plants act both as sinks and as point sources. However, Central Asian wastewater infrastructures are under-represented in the literature, and global syntheses are hindered by strong methodological heterogeneity (sampling regimes, size cut-offs, QA/QC). This PRISMA-guided critical review compiles and harmonizes data from 63 WWTP studies worldwide (402 matrix-stage observations), including the few available case studies from Kazakhstan and neighboring countries, to benchmark Central Asian plants against a global envelope and identify methodological and infrastructure gaps. Globally, influent concentrations cluster around a median ≈65 particles/L, while final/tertiary effluents show a median ≈2.2 particles/L. Median removal efficiency is 85.5% for secondary and 95.0% for tertiary/advanced trains, with ≈103–105 particles/kg DW typically retained in sludge. Across influent, effluent and sludge, fibers and fragments of PE, PP and PET dominate polymer morphology patterns, with similar PET/PE/PP signatures also reported in downstream river water. Central Asian influents fall within global interquartile ranges, but secondary-only facilities tend to yield effluents in the upper half of the global distribution. Overall, the review provides a first integrated, methodologically explicit assessment of WWTP microplastics in Central Asia and underscores the need for protocol harmonization, longitudinal monitoring, and targeted upgrades of polishing steps and sludge management in arid hydrosystems.

Share this paper