0
Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Microplastics in Wastewater Systems of Kazakhstan and Central Asia: A Critical Review of Analytical Methods, Uncertainties, and Research Gaps

Water 2026 Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
María-Elena Rodrigo-Clavero, Rodrigo-Ilarri Javier, Kulyash K. Alimova, Natalya S. Salikova, Lyudmila A. Makeyeva, Meiirman Berdali

Summary

A systematic review of 63 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) worldwide — including the first integrated assessment of Central Asian facilities — found that secondary treatment removes a median 85.5% of microplastics from wastewater, while tertiary treatment reaches 95%, but concentrates vast quantities of microplastics in sewage sludge. Central Asian plants with only secondary treatment release effluent in the upper range of global concentrations, underscoring the need for upgraded treatment and better monitoring in water-scarce regions where treated water is often reused in agriculture.

Study Type Environmental

Microplastics are increasingly recognized as contaminants of emerging concern in wastewater systems, where treatment plants act both as sinks and as point sources. However, Central Asian wastewater infrastructures are under-represented in the literature, and global syntheses are hindered by strong methodological heterogeneity (sampling regimes, size cut-offs, QA/QC). This PRISMA-guided critical review compiles and harmonizes data from 63 WWTP studies worldwide (402 matrix-stage observations), including the few available case studies from Kazakhstan and neighboring countries, to benchmark Central Asian plants against a global envelope and identify methodological and infrastructure gaps. Globally, influent concentrations cluster around a median ≈65 particles/L, while final/tertiary effluents show a median ≈2.2 particles/L. Median removal efficiency is 85.5% for secondary and 95.0% for tertiary/advanced trains, with ≈103–105 particles/kg DW typically retained in sludge. Across influent, effluent and sludge, fibers and fragments of PE, PP and PET dominate polymer morphology patterns, with similar PET/PE/PP signatures also reported in downstream river water. Central Asian influents fall within global interquartile ranges, but secondary-only facilities tend to yield effluents in the upper half of the global distribution. Overall, the review provides a first integrated, methodologically explicit assessment of WWTP microplastics in Central Asia and underscores the need for protocol harmonization, longitudinal monitoring, and targeted upgrades of polishing steps and sludge management in arid hydrosystems.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in Central Asian Wastewater Systems: Analytical Workflows, Quality Assurance, Quality Control, Uncertainties, and Research Priorities

This review of global research found that wastewater treatment plants remove most microplastics (tiny plastic particles) from sewage, with advanced treatment systems removing about 95% compared to 85% for basic treatment. However, the plastic particles that remain in treated water still end up in rivers and lakes where people get drinking water, and the captured plastics accumulate in sewage sludge that's often used as fertilizer on farms. The study shows that Central Asian countries like Kazakhstan need better wastewater treatment technology to reduce microplastic pollution in their water supplies.

Article Tier 2

Seasonal variation and removal of microplastics in a central Asian urban wastewater treatment plant

Researchers investigated microplastic presence and removal at a wastewater treatment plant in Astana, Kazakhstan, finding that the facility achieved 88 to 93 percent removal efficiency. Despite low concentrations in the treated water, the sheer volume of daily discharge means the plant still contributes meaningfully to microplastic pollution in nearby waterways. Polyethylene fragments were the most common type detected, with seasonal variation showing higher levels in summer influent.

Article Tier 2

The Pollution Characteristics and Fate of Microplastics in Typical Wastewater Treatment Systems in Northern China

Researchers analyzed microplastic contamination at two wastewater treatment plants in Zhengzhou, China, finding overall removal efficiencies of about 93 and 96 percent respectively. Fibers and fragments were the most common microplastic shapes detected, with much of the removed material ending up concentrated in sewage sludge. The study raises concerns that while treatment processes are effective at reducing waterborne microplastics, the contaminated sludge may redistribute the pollution when applied to agricultural land.

Article Tier 2

A review of the removal of microplastics in global wastewater treatment plants: Characteristics and mechanisms

This review analyzed data from 38 wastewater treatment plants across 11 countries to understand how effectively they remove microplastics. While treatment plants can remove the majority of microplastics from wastewater, significant quantities still pass through into waterways, and the microplastics captured in sewage sludge may re-enter the environment when that sludge is applied to farmland.

Article Tier 2

Removal of microplastics via wastewater treatment plants in india: Current knowledge and future directions: a review

This review assessed the capacity of wastewater treatment plants in India to remove microplastics, summarizing current knowledge on treatment efficiency, polymer types retained versus discharged, and the role of sludge as a secondary contamination pathway. The review found that Indian WWTPs remove a large fraction of incoming microplastics but still release particles into receiving water bodies, and identified priority research needs.

Share this paper