0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Aging processes and microplastic release behavior of aquaculture implements

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers studied how four types of plastic aquaculture equipment age and release microplastics under simulated marine conditions over 16 weeks. They found that PVC buoys released the most microplastic particles, followed by polypropylene cables, polyethylene nets, and PET buoys, with all materials developing increasingly rough surfaces, cracks, and oxygen-containing chemical groups during aging. The study provides guidance for selecting aquaculture materials that minimize microplastic pollution in marine environments.

With the rapid development of aquaculture, plastic implements (e.g., buoys, cables, and net curtains) have been widely used. However, long-term environmental exposure has led to their aging and fragmentation, which has become an important source of marine microplastics (MPs) pollution. This study investigated the mechanisms and characteristics of MPs released during the aging process of four types of aquaculture implements. By simulating marine ultraviolet radiation and mechanical abrasion, we conducted indoor aging experiments on polyethylene (PE) net curtains, polypropylene (PP) cables, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) ecological buoys, and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) traditional buoys over a period of 16 weeks, and analyzed the surface morphology, chemical structure, crystallinity change and MPs release. During the aging process, the surfaces of the aquaculture implements became increasingly rough, with the formation of depressions and cracks. Chemical structure analysis revealed a greater increase in oxygen-containing functional groups in PVC and PP compared to PE and PET. Crystallinity measurements showed that all materials exhibited increased crystallinity, with PP cables displaying the most pronounced enhancement, indicating a higher tendency toward embrittlement and fracture. Quantitative analysis of MP release and weight loss ranked the materials as follows: PVC buoys > PP cables > PE nets > PET buoys. This study provides a scientific basis for the optimal selection of aquaculture materials and for strategies to prevent and control microplastic pollution from aquaculture sources.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Searching for SMART(er) solutions: A laboratory-assessment of microplastic release from aquaculture nets and ropes

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tested aquaculture and fishing gear under simulated in-water abrasion to measure microplastic release rates under realistic operational conditions. The study found that net and rope materials shed substantial quantities of microplastics through routine mechanical wear.

Article Tier 2

Risk of aquaculture-derived microplastics in aquaculture areas: An overlooked issue or a non-issue?

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examines aquaculture-derived microplastics from degrading fishing nets and foam buoys, finding they represent a significant but overlooked source of marine microplastic pollution with distinct environmental consequences compared to other sources.

Article Tier 2

Linking UV aging of polymers and microplastics formation: An assessment employing various characterization techniques

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers examined the link between UV aging of plastic polymers and the generation of microplastics in marine environments, using environmental assessment tools to model the process. The study clarifies how photodegradation rates and polymer type influence the rate and quantity of microplastic formation.

Article Tier 2

Linking UV aging of polymers and microplastics formation: An assessment employing various characterization techniques

AI summary Read the abstract

This study used environmental assessment tools to model how UV aging of plastic polymers drives microplastic formation in marine environments. The analysis identified polymer-specific degradation rates and environmental conditions that accelerate the conversion of plastic debris into microplastics.

Article Tier 2

Searching for SMART(er) solutions: A laboratory-assessment of microplastic release from aquaculture nets and ropes

AI summary Read the abstract

This laboratory study simulated mechanical abrasion of plastic fishing gear and aquaculture equipment to quantify microplastic emissions, addressing the fisheries sector as a poorly characterized source of marine microplastic pollution. Abrasion of plastic gear released measurable quantities of particles, with emission rates varying by material type and abrasion conditions.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper