0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Microplastics in groundwater: a global analysis

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2024 Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Anna Kukkola Uwe Schneidewind, Anna Kukkola Anna Kukkola Anna Kukkola Anna Kukkola Uwe Schneidewind, Stefan Krause, Anna Kukkola Danielle Marchant, Uwe Schneidewind, Uwe Schneidewind, Uwe Schneidewind, Uwe Schneidewind, Uwe Schneidewind, Daniel M. Perkins, Anna Kukkola Anna Kukkola Uwe Schneidewind, Anna Kukkola Uwe Schneidewind, Uwe Schneidewind, Stefan Krause, Stefan Krause, Uwe Schneidewind, Stefan Krause, Uwe Schneidewind, Uwe Schneidewind, Daniel M. Perkins, Stefan Krause, Stefan Krause, Stefan Krause, Anna Kukkola Anna Kukkola Anna Kukkola Uwe Schneidewind, Uwe Schneidewind, Uwe Schneidewind, Uwe Schneidewind, Uwe Schneidewind, Uwe Schneidewind, Uwe Schneidewind, Uwe Schneidewind, Uwe Schneidewind, Uwe Schneidewind, Uwe Schneidewind, Uwe Schneidewind, Stefan Krause, Anna Kukkola Anna Kukkola Stefan Krause, Danielle Marchant, Danielle Marchant, Danielle Marchant, Danielle Marchant, Julia Reiss, Anna Kukkola Anna Kukkola Stefan Krause, Anna Kukkola Anna Kukkola Uwe Schneidewind, Anna Kukkola Uwe Schneidewind, Julia Reiss, Julia Reiss, Julia Reiss, Julia Reiss, Julia Reiss, Uwe Schneidewind, Uwe Schneidewind, Uwe Schneidewind, Daniel M. Perkins, Stefan Krause, Stefan Krause, Anna Kukkola Stefan Krause, Uwe Schneidewind, Anna Kukkola Daniel M. Perkins, Uwe Schneidewind, Anna Kukkola Daniel M. Perkins, Stefan Krause, Anna Kukkola Uwe Schneidewind, Anna Kukkola Stefan Krause, Anna Kukkola Anna Kukkola Stefan Krause, Anne L. Robertson, Stefan Krause, Stefan Krause, Uwe Schneidewind, Anne L. Robertson, Anna Kukkola Anne L. Robertson, Anne L. Robertson, Stefan Krause, Stefan Krause, Anna Kukkola Stefan Krause, Anna Kukkola Stefan Krause, Uwe Schneidewind, Anna Kukkola Anna Kukkola Stefan Krause, Uwe Schneidewind, Stefan Krause, Anna Kukkola Anna Kukkola Julia Reiss, Daniel M. Perkins, Anne L. Robertson, Anne L. Robertson, Anne L. Robertson, Anne L. Robertson, Anna Kukkola

Summary

Researchers conducted a global groundwater sampling study to characterize microplastic contamination in aquifer systems worldwide, investigating transport mechanisms and fate of particles in anoxic subsurface environments where knowledge gaps remain despite extensive research on surface water systems.

Microplastic particles (MPs) have emerged as contaminants of concern in the aquatic environment and recent research has made substantial progress to improving our understanding of the transport of MPs in riverine systems. Much less is known about the potential contamination with MPs of the world's groundwater resources while transport into and fate in these anoxic systems is largely unclear. However, closing this knowledge gap is imperative to predict any potential long-term impact of MPs on groundwater ecosystems. Here we present first results of a global groundwater sampling study conducted with the help of the scientific community. Samples were obtained from around the world via caves, boreholes, monitoring wells and surface springs. Sample collection followed a standardised protocol to guarantee comparability among different sampling locations and to ensure ease of use at low cost. At each site, about 300 L of groundwater were collected and filtered through a series of metal sieves (123 and 25 µm mesh size). Filtrates and meshes were then stored in 50 mL glass vials for further analysis. Field blanks ¿25 µm were collected on a metal mesh during groundwater sampling to account for potential contamination. Samples were processed by first cutting the metal meshes into pieces and submerging them in a ZnCl2 solution in glass beakers in an ultrasonic bath. Afterwards, mesh pieces were rinsed with ZnCl2 and beaker contents were washed into glass units (270 mL volume) to facilitate density separation. After density separation had completed, the supernatant containing putative MPs was subjected to organic matter digestion using hydrogen peroxide. Samples were then prepared for fluorescent microscopy using Nile red dye, while MP characterisation and polymer identification were carried out using Raman spectroscopy. First results indicate variable MP concentrations in groundwater resources, with increasing concentrations towards the smaller size range. Also see: https://micro2024.sciencesconf.org/559353/document

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper