We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Effects of biodegradable microplastics on the crustacean isopod Idotea balthica basteri Audouin, 1826
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested the effects of biodegradable microplastics on a marine crustacean and found that even plastics designed to break down can cause harm to aquatic organisms. Exposure affected the animals' survival, molting, and overall fitness, particularly at higher concentrations. The study challenges the assumption that biodegradable plastics are inherently safe for marine environments.
Plastic pollution is a notable environmental issue, being plastic widespread and characterized by long lifetime. Serious environmental problems are caused by the improper management of plastic end-of-life. In fact, plastic litter is currently detected in any environment. Biodegradable Polymers (BPs) are promising materials if correctly applied and managed at their end of life, to minimize environmental problems. However, poor data on the fate and toxicity of BPs on marine organisms still limit their applicability. In this work we tested the effects of five biodegradable polymers (polybutylene succinate, PBS; polybutylene succinate-co-butylene adipate, PBSA; polycaprolactone, PCL; poly (3-hydroxybutyrates, PHB; polylactic acid, PLA) widely used for several purposes. Adult individuals of the isopod Idotea balthica basteri were fed on these polymers for twenty-seven days by adding biodegradable microplastic polymers (BMPs) to formulated feeds at two concentrations, viz. 0.84 and 8.4 g/kg feed. The plastic fragments affected the mortality rates of the isopods, as well as the expression levels of eighteen genes (tested by Real Time qPCR) involved in stress response and detoxification processes. Our findings confirmed that I. balthica basteri is a convenient model organism to study the response to environmental pollution and emerging contaminants in the aquatic environment, and highlighted the need for the correct use of BMPs.
More Papers Like This
Biodegradable microplastics: Uptake by and effects on the rockpool shrimp Palaemon elegans (Crustacea: Decapoda)
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers fed shrimp three types of microplastics, including two biodegradable kinds (PLA and PHBV) and conventional polyethylene, and found that all types were readily eaten. Surprisingly, the biodegradable microplastics stayed in the shrimp's stomachs longer than the conventional plastic, and all types triggered stress-related enzyme activity. This suggests that biodegradable plastics are not necessarily safer for marine life than conventional plastics once they break down into microplastic-sized particles.
Comparison of the Potential Chronic Toxicity of Polypropylene and Polylactic Acid to the Amphipod Gammarus Aequicauda
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the chronic toxicity of conventional polypropylene (PP) and biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) microplastics on the marine amphipod Gammarus aequicauda to assess whether bioplastics are a safer alternative. The study found that both polymer types caused harm to this crustacean, indicating biodegradable plastics are not necessarily benign once released into marine environments.
A review on fate and ecotoxicity of biodegradable microplastics in aquatic system: Are biodegradable plastics truly safe for the environment?
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines whether biodegradable plastics are truly safe for aquatic environments, finding that they can break down into microplastics faster than conventional plastics and cause comparable or even greater harm to algae, invertebrates, and fish. The findings suggest that switching to biodegradable plastics alone will not solve the microplastic pollution problem, and these particles can still enter the human food chain through contaminated seafood.
Marine biodegradable polymers and zooplankton: A case study on the effects of PHBV microplastics on Artemia franciscana
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers studied the physiological effects of PHBV biodegradable microplastics on the zooplankton species Artemia franciscana, examining survival, growth, feeding, and lipid composition. The study found that even biodegradable polymer microplastics can affect zooplankton physiology, suggesting that simply replacing conventional plastics with biodegradable alternatives may not fully eliminate ecological risks in marine environments.
Can biodegradable plastics mitigate plastamination? Feedbacks from marine organisms
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested whether biodegradable plastics (PLA) are safer for marine life than conventional plastics (polypropylene) and found that both types caused similar toxic effects in marine animals. Both plastics triggered stress responses and cell damage in brine shrimp at multiple life stages, with more advanced stages being more sensitive. This raises doubts about whether switching to biodegradable plastics will actually reduce the harm of microplastic pollution in oceans.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.