We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Evaluation of Microplastic Pollution in Gills of Freshwater Fish in a Neotropical Hydrographic Basin, Brazil
AI summary Read the abstract
Analysis of gill tissue from 98 freshwater fish across eight species in Brazil's Sorocaba River basin found microplastics in every individual, with fibers comprising 74% of the 385 particles detected and highest contamination in the most disturbed river. The universal gill contamination across species demonstrates that freshwater fish in human-impacted watersheds serve as a direct route for microplastic entry into aquatic food webs and ultimately human diets.
The disposal of plastic materials in recent years has increased exponentially due to human activity. Thus, the accumulation of these residues represents a major concern due to the impact that has been observed, mainly in freshwater aquatic environments and their biota. This study aimed to analyze the presence of microplastics in the gills of fish from the Sorocaba River basin, relating the natural history of the species and the rivers where they were collected. 98 gill samples from eight species sampled at 9 different points of the 4 main Rivers of the basin were analyzed. A total of 385 particles were found, the majority being fibers (74%), predominantly black (63%) and sizes ranging from 2 to 5 mm. The presence of microplastics was verified in all individuals studied, as they are highly susceptible to exposure and retention of plastic microparticles. The highest occurrence of microparticles in fish occurred in the Tatuí River, being verified in the Principal Component Analysis (PCA), considered one of the most disturbed Rivers in the evaluated basin. The particles were identified as polyethylene, polyester, polymethyl methacrylate and polyethylene terephthalate. The present study showed that the gills constitute an important microplastic transfer route for freshwater fish species, and the ecological traits of the species may explain differences in contamination. Considering space–time sampling and different species that make up the fish community is vitally important to understand the scale of microplastic contamination and, subsequently, take effective mitigation measures.
More Papers Like This
Microplastic contamination in the gills of Macrobrachium amazonicum (Heller, 1862) from the reservoir of the Funil Hydroelectric Power Plant, Minas Gerais, Brazil
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found thousands of tiny plastic fragments lodged in the gills of freshwater shrimp from a Brazilian reservoir, with larger, more mature shrimp carrying more plastic than younger ones. Since this shrimp species is commonly eaten and economically important, these findings raise concerns about plastic pollution moving up the food chain, potentially onto our own dinner plates.
Ingestion of Microplastic by Fish of Different Feeding Habits in Urbanized and Non-urbanized Streams in Southern Brazil
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found that fish in urbanized streams in southern Brazil were significantly more likely to have ingested microplastic fibers than fish in non-urbanized streams, and that omnivorous species faced the highest exposure risk. This highlights how urban development drives microplastic contamination into freshwater food chains long before particles reach the ocean.
Biochemical responses and ingestion of microplastics by native fishes in the Atlantic Forest, southern Brazil
AI summary
Researchers assessed fish health along a contamination gradient in Brazil's Atlantic Forest and found that microplastic accumulation was highest in carnivorous fish at impacted midstream sites, while biochemical stress markers were elevated even in upstream areas considered relatively pristine, underscoring the need for ongoing biomonitoring.
Does deforestation contribute to microplastic contamination in stream fish in the Southwestern Amazon?
AI summary Read the abstract
A study of 584 fish from 20 Amazon streams found that fish in deforested areas ingested significantly more microplastics than those in forested watersheds, with feeding strategy and seasonal flooding also influencing exposure. Deforestation not only threatens biodiversity directly but also increases wildlife exposure to plastic pollution, compounding the ecological damage of forest loss.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.