0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Assessing the ecotoxicological effects of novel cellulose nanocrystalline glitter compared to conventional polyethylene terephthalate glitter: Toxicity to springtails (Folsomia candida)

Chemosphere 2024 4 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Dannielle S. Green Dannielle S. Green Dannielle S. Green Po-Hao Chen, Dannielle S. Green Dannielle S. Green Dannielle S. Green Dannielle S. Green Suzie M. Reichman, Shamali De Silva, Po-Hao Chen, Zhuyun Gu, Dannielle S. Green Benjamin E. Droguet, Shamali De Silva, Dannielle S. Green Benjamin E. Droguet, Dannielle S. Green Dannielle S. Green Dannielle S. Green Ian Lam, Dannielle S. Green Dannielle S. Green Suzie M. Reichman, Dannielle S. Green Ian Lam, Dannielle S. Green Dannielle S. Green Dannielle S. Green Dannielle S. Green Dannielle S. Green Dannielle S. Green Silvia Vignolini, Suzie M. Reichman, Zhuyun Gu, Shamali De Silva, Silvia Vignolini, Suzie M. Reichman, Silvia Vignolini, Silvia Vignolini, Dannielle S. Green

Summary

Researchers compared the ecological effects of conventional plastic glitter made from polyethylene terephthalate with a newer cellulose-based alternative on soil-dwelling springtails. They found that both types of glitter had minimal toxic effects at the concentrations tested, though the conventional glitter showed some impact on reproduction at high doses. The findings suggest that cellulose-based glitter may be a safer, more sustainable replacement for traditional plastic glitter.

Polymers
Body Systems

Glitter is a type of microplastic, and thus there is a need to assess its potential impacts on the environment and to assess the potential for non-plastic cellulose nanocrystal structurally colored glitters as safe and sustainable replacements. The ecotoxicity of glitter has been mostly ignored in the research literature, with only a few published studies focusing on aquatic organisms. Therefore, an exposure experiment was conducted to examine the impact of conventional polyethylene terephthalate (PET) glitter as well as untreated and heat-treated cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) based glitter on the survival, reproduction, and length of Folsomia candida (springtail). Folsomia candida reproduction was reduced by 61% (P = 0.013) after exposure to PET glitter at 1000 mg/kg, while no significant effects were observed on F. candida survival and length. In contrast, there were no significant impacts on F. candida survival, length, or reproduction when exposed to untreated or heat-treated CNC glitter. These results indicate that exposure to PET glitter may impact soil invertebrates at the population level, and that CNC glitter has potential as a biodegradable non-plastic alternative to PET glitter to decrease detrimental effects on soil ecosystems.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper