0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Sign in to save

Field assessment of engineered bioretention as microplastics sink through site characterization and hydrologic modeling

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2024 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Amanda R Laramie, William D. Shuster, Yongli Z. Wager, Meisam Darabi

Summary

A field study of bioretention cells — garden-like stormwater filters used in green infrastructure — found that their soils contained 7 to 10 times more microplastics than background soils, with polypropylene and polyethylene dominating. This confirms that bioretention systems are effective at capturing microplastics from urban runoff, but it also raises questions about what happens to the accumulated plastic over time and whether it eventually leaches back into groundwater.

Green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) practices like bioretention are considered a sink for microplastics washed in from urbanized land uses-land covers, and thereby regulating the environmental dispersion of microplastics. However, the capacity of GSI in microplastic sequestration remain unclear. This work investigated the spatial distributions of microplastics within bioretention cells and their soils, concentration in the GSI groundwater monitoring well, and the overall potential of GSI as a sink for microplastics. The average microplastic concentration in GSI soils (2718 - 3833 MPs/kg dry soil) is 7-10 times higher than background soils (262 - 520 MPs/kg dry soil). The most abundant microplastics observed were polypropylene (57 %), polyethylene (17 %), and rubber/bituminous (16 %), indicating the major sources of microplastics derived from post-consumer plastics and tire wear. Soils closest to the GSI stormwater inlet sequestered the most particles, and the microplastic concentration decreased with soil depth. Our hydrologic modeling, based on measured soil and hydraulic parameters, suggested that runoff overtopping the freeboard of the bioretention cell - and potentially dispersing microplastics into the surrounding environment - was unlikely. Microplastics in the GSI groundwater monitoring well was minimal at 11 MPs/L. These results suggest that GSI can capture and sequester microplastics to mitigate microplastic pollution in the environment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Plastic pollution risks in bioretention systems: a case study

Researchers investigated plastic pollution in urban stormwater bioretention systems and found these green infrastructure features both accumulate microplastics from road runoff and risk leaching plastic particles into groundwater, raising concerns about their role as pollution pathways.

Article Tier 2

Occurrence and Pathways of Microplastics in Bioretention Filters

Researchers found eleven microplastic polymer types in bioretention filter soil and stormwater samples in an urban setting, characterizing the occurrence and pathways of microplastics entering these green infrastructure systems from contaminated impervious surface runoff.

Article Tier 2

Abundance, distribution, and composition of microplastics in the filter media of nine aged stormwater bioretention systems

Researchers analyzed microplastic abundance and distribution in the filter media of nine aged stormwater bioretention systems, finding that these green infrastructure installations accumulate significant microplastic loads, with particles distributed throughout the filter depth rather than concentrating at the surface.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics removal from stormwater runoff by bioretention cells: A review

This review examines the potential of bioretention cells, a type of green infrastructure, to remove microplastics from stormwater runoff. Researchers analyzed how these systems filter microplastics through soil media and vegetation and identified the key design parameters that affect removal efficiency. The study suggests that bioretention cells offer a promising nature-based solution for reducing microplastic loads entering waterways from urban areas.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics: The Occurrence in Stormwater Runoff and the Effectiveness of Bioretention Systems for Removal

Researchers measured microplastic concentrations in stormwater runoff and tested the removal efficiency of bioretention systems including green roofs, bioswales, and bioretention cells, finding that these green infrastructure systems can significantly reduce microplastic loads before they reach surface waters. The study provides baseline data on stormwater as a microplastic transport pathway and evaluates a nature-based treatment solution.

Share this paper