0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

The Effect of Microplastics on Microbial Succession at Impaired and Unimpaired Sites in a Riverine System

2024 Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Anne L. Gilewski, Saurav Shrestha, Sharon N. Kahara, Nikolas M. Stasulli

Summary

Researchers compared microbial biofilm diversity on microplastic polymers and natural substrates at impaired and unimpaired riverine sites, examining how environmental nutrient loads, seasonality, and geography influence microbiome succession on plastic surfaces in freshwater ecosystems.

Study Type Environmental

Abstract Background Studies into biofilms and interactions with anthropogenic substrates like microplastic polymers are predominantly represented in the literature concerning marine environments. Less is known about microplastics in riverine environments that feed the microplastic accumulation of marine environments, transporting potentially harmful or pathogenic organisms that have accumulated on the microplastics. Environmental nutrient loads, seasonality, and geography are all known to influence microbiome formation. This project compared the microbial diversity of biofilms that developed on microplastics to natural stone substrates in an impaired and unimpaired section of the Quinnipiac River Watershed. We evaluated microbial diversity and composition via 16S rRNA gene sequencing while monitoring total colony and fecal coliform colony counts using standard water monitoring methods. Results Total coliform colony counts were higher in the impaired Quinnipiac River than in unimpaired Honeypot Brook (W = 583, p = 0.037) and on the microplastic substrate than stone substrate (W = 1038, p = 0.022). Sequenced features to the class level were dominated by Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, and Gammaproteobacteria, comprising 75% of the community biome. Simpson’s Diversity indices indicated that within the two substrates, there was little variation in the features present. However, it was noted that microplastic alpha diversity trended slightly lower than the stone. Further analysis of common aquatic enteropathogens showed that the genera Citrobacter was significantly more abundant on the microplastics at both locations. Conclusions Our results indicate impaired waterbodies with a microplastic burden may retain greater fecal coliform bacterial loads than unimpaired waterbodies. Increased microplastic loads in compromised lotic systems may have an additive impact. Water quality remediation and careful monitoring are recommended to reduce this effect. Comparing this study with environmental community analysis could provide valuable insight into preferential surface attachment of bacteria onto microplastic.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Distinctive patterns of bacterial community succession in the riverine micro-plastisphere in view of biofilm development and ecological niches

Scientists studied how bacterial communities develop on microplastics versus natural materials in river water and found that plastics support a distinct pattern of microbial colonization. The research identified specific bacteria capable of degrading microplastics and revealed that competition among microbes on plastic surfaces follows unexpected patterns compared to natural substrates.

Article Tier 2

Biofilms on plastic litter in an urban river: Community composition and activity vary by substrate type

Researchers examined biofilms colonizing plastic litter versus natural surfaces in an urban river, finding that community composition and metabolic activity vary by substrate type, with plastic surfaces hosting distinct microbial communities that may influence plastic degradation rates.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic is an Abundant and Distinct Microbial Habitat in an Urban River

Researchers demonstrated that microplastic surfaces in an urban river host a microbial community that is distinct from surrounding water and sediment communities, establishing microplastic as an abundant and ecologically distinct habitat for river microorganisms.

Article Tier 2

Microbial community niches on microplastics and prioritized environmental factors under various urban riverine conditions

Researchers manipulated organic content, salinity, and dissolved oxygen in bioreactors to assess which environmental factors most strongly shaped microbial communities colonizing microplastics in urban rivers. Dissolved oxygen and organic carbon content were identified as priority drivers of plastisphere community composition, with implications for predicting pathogen enrichment on MPs across river conditions.

Article Tier 2

Bacterial and fungal assemblages and functions associated with biofilms differ between diverse types of plastic debris in a freshwater system

Researchers characterised bacterial and fungal assemblages on three types of plastic debris in a freshwater urban river system, finding that microbial communities on plastics differ from those in surrounding water. High-throughput sequencing revealed that alpha diversity of bacterial communities was higher on polyethylene microplastics than on other plastic types, with intraspecies interactions between bacteria and fungi differing across diverse plastic substrates.

Share this paper