0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Exploring alternatives for detecting microplastics in the human body: questionnaire survey

Scientific Reports 2024 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Yanrong Wang, Yongbin Zhu, Justino Jose Capapelo, Yueping Wu, Liping Shi, Yue Yang, Yue Yang, Ping Chen, Shulan He, Jiangping Li

Summary

Researchers conducted a quasi-experimental study comparing microplastic levels in the feces of participants who ate meals from disposable plastic tableware versus non-plastic tableware for one month. They found statistically significant differences in both the total quantity and types of microplastics between exposure groups, particularly for PET and polyethylene polymers. The study suggests that questionnaire-based epidemiological tools may complement laboratory analysis for assessing population-level microplastic exposure.

Polymers
Body Systems
Models

Microplastics (MPs) can enter the body via plastic products. Given modern plastic exposure, we seek to assess MP exposure in large populations through epidemiological tools. In this quasi-experimental study, every participant filled out a questionnaire, and those who satisfied any of the following requirements were not allowed to continue in the study: Diabetes, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, infectious diseases. Participants in the exposure and control groups were provided three hot meals in disposable plastic tableware (DPT) (n = 30) or non-DPT (n = 30), respectively. After a month of observation, individuals in the exposure group discontinued the three meals provided in DPT (n = 27) for 1 month as the post-exposure group. Each Participant in the three groups received a questionnaire survey and fecal sample collection. We compared the differences in MP levels between different groups and used the Bland-Altman analysis method to evaluate the consistency of the results obtained by different measurement methods. Statistically significant differences in the total quantity (P (0.80 matching degree) = 0.020; P (0.65 matching degree) < 0.001) and types (Polyethylene Terephthalate (EVA) (P = 0.039), Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) (P = 0.022), Polyvinyl Butyral (PVB) (P = 0.013), Chlorinated Polyethylene (CPE) (P = 0.039), phenolic epoxy resin (P = 0.012)) of MPs were observed between the exposure and post-exposure groups. The Bland-Altman analysis results indicate that the two methods exhibit good consistency in the three groups (control group: mean difference = 0.54, agreement limits (95% CI) = - 0.44 ~ 1.54; exposure group: mean difference = 0.41, agreement limits (95% CI) =  - 0.19 ~ 1.01; post-exposure group: mean difference = 0.19, agreement limits (95% CI) =  - 0.63 ~ 1.02). The method based on questionnaire surveys can substitute the method of fecal sample detection to evaluate the exposure of MP particles.

Share this paper