0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Riverine macroplastic survey along the segments of Tullahan River in Metro Manila, Philippines

Frontiers in Environmental Science 2024 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Allyza L. Talavera, Lorrayne Faye M. Dalida, Ma. Brida Lea D. Diola

Summary

Researchers surveyed macroplastic flux and riverbank litter composition along segments of the Tullahan River in Metro Manila, Philippines using visual counting, float velocity measurements, and manual litter collection, finding that plastic wrappers and thin PE films were the dominant contributors. Sites with residential housing closest to the riverbank showed the highest plastic flux, with waste characterization showing 30-41% residuals and 5-21% recyclables.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

The Philippines is one of the world’s main contributors to global marine plastic pollution. However, field data remains scarce, so model estimates of riverine plastic pollution may be inaccurate. This paper aims to characterize the macrolitter observed along the Tullahan River, with focus on plastics, passing through the barangays of Quezon City and Valenzuela City in Metro Manila. The impact of solid waste management and land use activities on plastic flux were also investigated. For the floating litter, visual counting and float method were used to determine the plastic flux and river velocity, respectively. Riverbank litter was collected manually to characterize it based on plastic product and polymer type. Results show that the macroplastic flux was lowest on the site where residential houses are farthest from the stream. Waste characterization revealed that riverbank litter was primarily plastic – 30%–41% were residuals, and 5%–21% were recyclables. Both methods revealed that wrappers and thin PE plastics are the top contributors to riverine macroplastic pollution. Therefore, the entry of macroplastics into the river may be due to land use activities and weak enforcement of existing solid waste management (SWM) policies. The points discussed in the study can help in improving SWM and land use planning. The results can also increase the accuracy of model estimates.

Share this paper