We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Research trends in nano- and microplastic ingestion in marine planktonic food webs
AI summary Read the abstract
This review analyzed 120 studies on nano- and microplastic ingestion in marine zooplankton, covering protozoans, holoplankton, meroplankton, and ichthyoplankton. Researchers found that laboratory experiments are overrepresented compared to field studies, with polystyrene beads used in 54% of experiments despite not reflecting real-world microplastic diversity. The review identifies significant gaps, including understudied groups like protozoans and inconsistent reporting units that make cross-study comparisons difficult.
Over the past decade, microplastic research on ingestion and impacts in marine biota has received significant attention. Zooplankton has become a subject of interest due to their crucial role in marine food webs. This review focuses on trends in nano- and microplastics (NMPs) ingestion studies in marine zooplankton. Four groups of organisms were considered: protozoans, holoplankton, meroplankton and ichthyoplankton. Of 120 reviewed articles, holoplankton was the most studied group, with laboratory experiments dominating over field studies. Although NMPs sizes and polymer types are diversifying in laboratory experiments, their characteristics are still far from representing the complexity of NMPs found in nature. Polystyrene (as polymer type) and beads (as shape) are overrepresented in laboratory experiments (54% and 79%, respectively). Furthermore, most NMPs concentrations used in the laboratory exceed those found in the field. The units used to report ingestion of NMPs in zooplankton vary greatly, with "microplastics per individual" being the most frequently used. In addition, certain planktonic groups (e.g., protozoans and ichthyoplankton) and behavioral traits, such as ambush feeding, have been poorly investigated. This variability hampers comparisons between studies and thus mechanistic insights into NMPs ingestion in marine zooplankton. This review identifies research gaps and it highlights the ongoing disparity between environmental and laboratory conditions in zooplankton ingestion studies. We encourage the scientific community to harmonize the reporting units for NMPs ingestion and focus on more environmentally realistic studies with a trait-based approach. Transitioning towards more hypothesis-driven experiments is crucial to clarify the mechanistic importance of environmentally relevant microplastic features.
More Papers Like This
Microplastic and Nanoplastic Pollution in Zooplankton: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Ingestion, Ecotoxicological Effects, and Research Gaps
AI summary Read the abstract
Tiny plastic particles are piling up in the oceans, and this review of 250 studies shows that zooplankton — the microscopic creatures that form the base of the ocean food chain — are eating them, since the plastic bits are often the same size as the food they normally consume. Because zooplankton get eaten by fish, and fish end up on our plates, this matters for understanding how plastic pollution might move up the food chain to humans, though the researchers note most studies so far are lab-based with only a couple of "model" species, so real-world impacts on wild ecosystems and human health are still poorly understood. The big takeaway: scientists need more real
Bioavailability and effects of microplastics on marine zooplankton: A review
AI summary Read the abstract
This review synthesized laboratory and field evidence on microplastic bioavailability and effects on marine zooplankton, finding that multiple taxa readily ingest microplastics with negative impacts on feeding, reproduction, and energy balance, and that zooplankton represent a critical route for transferring microplastics into marine food webs. The authors identify particle size, concentration, and feeding behavior as the main determinants of microplastic bioavailability to zooplankton.
Towards the suitable monitoring of ingestion of microplastics by marine biota: A review
AI summary Read the abstract
This review assessed various monitoring methods for detecting microplastic ingestion by marine biota, comparing laboratory and field-based approaches. The authors recommend method selection based on organism type and research question and call for more consistent reporting standards to enable cross-study comparison.
In Situ Microplastic Ingestion by Marine Zooplankton: a Review
AI summary Read the abstract
Tiny ocean creatures called zooplankton, a key food source for fish, are eating microplastics, which could allow these plastic particles to move up the food chain and potentially end up on our plates. This review of existing research finds that most lab studies use much higher microplastic concentrations than what's actually found in the ocean, meaning the real-world health risks are still unclear. Scientists say more real-world (not just lab) studies are needed before we can fully understand how serious this risk really is.
Microplastics and plankton: Knowledge from laboratory and field studies to distinguish contamination from pollution
AI summary Read the abstract
Of 147 publications on microplastics and plankton, 70% were laboratory studies, and field-collected microplastics differed substantially from those used in experiments, making lab-to-field comparisons unreliable; population- and ecosystem-level pollution effects in natural settings remain largely unstudied.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.