0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Distribution and characterization of microplastics in Narmada River: Insights from differently impacted anthropogenic zones of upper and middle basin in Central India

Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2026 Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Dinesh Parida, Konica Katare, Kanika Kiran, R. Nogueira, Florian Bittner, Pia Ansahl, Robin-Macmahon Bähre, Hans-Josef Endres, Hans-Josef Endres, Kiran Bala

Summary

Scientists found tiny plastic particles called microplastics throughout India's Narmada River, which millions of people depend on for drinking water. The plastic pollution was worst near tourist areas and semi-urban zones, with 19 different types of plastics detected, including some that are especially harmful to health. This matters because these microplastics can end up in our drinking water and food chain, potentially affecting human health.

Study Type Environmental

The Narmada River is a vital water source for irrigation, drinking, and hydroelectric projects in India. It passes through rural, agricultural, semi urban, and tourist intensive areas, making it vulnerable to anthropogenic pressure. We proposed that the abundance of microplastics (MP) and the diversity of polymers vary across these anthropogenically disturbed regions, with tourist and semi-urban contributing more than rural agriculture regions. To test this, we assessed the upper and middle river basin (in surface water and sediments). Morphological characterisation (shape, size, colour) was performed using a stereomicroscope and particle size analyser, while chemical composition was determined by ATR-FTIR and µFTIR. The average concentration of MPs is 4738 ± 5303 particles/m³ in surface water and 290071 ± 199929 particles/m³ in sediments, respectively. Nineteen distinct polymers including hazardous polymers like polyurethane and poly vinyl chloride were identified revealing complex chemical footprint. In surface water, polypropylene, polyethylene, and polyethylene terephthalate were dominant, whereas in sediments, polyethylene and polyethylene terephthalate were more prevalent. Fibers dominated surface water, while fragments dominated sediments. Additives like dibutyl sebacate and ethyl hexyl epoxy soyate were also identified. Polymer hazard index (PHI) and potential ecological risk index (PERI) also predicted the risks imposed by the hazardous polymers. Tourist locations with anthropogenic disturbances have a higher MP abundance in surface water, while both semi-urban and tourist locations contribute to MP pollution in sediments. These findings demonstrate that anthropogenic activities strongly influence MP pollution in the Narmada River and highlight the urgent need for region-specific management strategies.

Share this paper