We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Reusable Personal Protective Equipment Viewed Through the Lens of Sustainability
Summary
This paper evaluates the sustainability impacts of single-use vs. reusable personal protective equipment, finding that polypropylene-based disposable masks generate microplastics as they degrade and have higher carbon footprints than reusable alternatives.
From early 2020 the COVID-19 pandemic drove dramatic increases in the production and use of single use disposable masks, respirators and gowns, and highlighted the vulnerability of supply chains for these items. This paper explores the impacts of the rising demands for these single use items through the lens of sustainability, by collating data on the carbon footprint and other impacts, and then discussing challenges, solutions, and future perspectives. Polypropylene and other key synthetic fibre components of these items are not biodegradable, and persist in the environments for prolonged periods generating microplastics as they degrade slowly. Various methods have been shown to allow limited repeated use of surgical masks and respirators, and this has spurred the development of masks and respirators designed for many cycles of reuse. Parallel discussions around gowns reveal that reuseable gowns offer many advantages for performance as well as reduced environmental impact. At the local dental clinic level, those making purchasing decisions should consider impacts of their product choices on the environment. Such impacts occur from manufacture, transport, and disposal of PPE, and from degradation within the environment. Regulators need to encourage use of reuseable items and facilitate this through local guidelines, while at the international level, more work is needed to develop uniform standards for reuseable masks, respirators and gowns.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Disposable over Reusable Face Masks: Public Safety or Environmental Disaster?
This review compares the public health benefits and environmental impacts of disposable versus reusable face masks in the context of COVID-19. While disposable masks consistently provide higher protection, they contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions, landfill waste, and microplastic pollution. The study discusses the need for approaches that balance pandemic safety with environmental sustainability.
Applicability of Membranes in Protective Face Masks and Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Face Masks with Life Cycle Assessment
A comparison of reusable and disposable face masks using life cycle assessment found that while reusable masks have lower total environmental impact over their lifetime, disposable masks shed microplastic fibers that could enter both environmental and human biological systems.
Analysis of the Optimal Use of Fabric Masks and Disposable Medical Masks During the COVID-19
This paper is not about microplastics — it compares the environmental, economic, and public health trade-offs of disposable medical masks versus reusable cloth masks during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The impact and effectiveness of the general public wearing masks to reduce the spread of pandemics in the UK: a multidisciplinary comparison of single-use masks versus reusable face masks.
This study compared the filtration effectiveness and environmental impact of single-use versus reusable face masks during COVID-19, finding that reusable masks can be comparable in protection while significantly reducing plastic waste. Billions of disposable masks ended up in the environment during the pandemic, releasing microplastic fibers and fragments as they degraded.
Facing COVID-19: Quantifying the Use of Reusable vs. Disposable Facemasks
This study compared the environmental cost of single-use surgical masks versus reusable cloth masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Reusable masks had a significantly lower environmental impact per use, especially when washed efficiently. The findings support policies favoring reusable masks to reduce pandemic-related plastic waste.