We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Analysis of sustainability differences among various shrimp farming models: a systematic review and meta analysis
Summary
This meta-analysis of 136 studies compared the economic, ecological, and social sustainability of different shrimp aquaculture models, finding that integrated multi-trophic pond systems performed best overall and that microplastic levels were among the key factors differentiating ecological outcomes between farming approaches. The results provide a quantitative framework for selecting aquaculture systems that balance productivity with environmental sustainability.
Aquaculture technology has diversified over the years, but its environmental impact and negative social effects have raised widespread concern. Currently, research on the differences in aquaculture models mainly focuses on a single dimension, lacking quantitative assessment methods for the various differences in farming models. This study employs a meta-analysis method to identify economic and ecological indicators' data from 136 pieces of literature published between 2002 and 2024. It systematically evaluates the impact of different aquaculture modes and technologies on the comprehensive (economic, ecological, and social) benefits of shrimp farming from multiple dimensions, exploring the differences in benefits between farming modes and the trends as they change with technology and indicators. The results indicate that the Pond Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture model (PIMTA), which uses biological hierarchy technology, exhibits the best comprehensive benefits, followed by the Indoor Super Intensive Recirculating Culture (ISIC_Recirculation), while the Pond Monoculture model (PMC) shows the lowest comprehensive benefits (-1.6425). In terms of ecological benefits, the ISIC_Recirculation model and the PIMTA model perform the best, with total solids (TS), the Shannon index, and microplastics (MPS) significantly affecting the differences in ecological benefits. The Indoor Super Intensive Exchange Culture (ISIC_Exchange) model stands out in terms of social benefits. Regarding economic benefits, the PIMTA model and the Indoor Super Intensive culture models (ISIC) are significantly higher than the PMC model. Based on simulations using collected data, when the survival rate (SR) is greater than 68.37%, the impact of different farming techniques on comprehensive benefits gradually diminishes as the survival rate (SR) increases. Higher pH levels reduce the impact of these differences, while higher dissolved oxygen (DO) levels increase their impact. This study proposes an evaluation method for the differences in comprehensive benefits among aquaculture models and technologies based on meta-analysis. It provides a scientific basis for optimizing the selection of aquaculture models, enhancing farming efficiency, and predicting the long-term trends of benefits from different farming models, thereby promoting the green and sustainable development of the aquaculture industry.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Impact of aquaculture practices on the sustainability of social-ecological systems in coastal zones of the Mekong delta
This Vietnamese study examines how different shrimp aquaculture intensities affect the sustainability of coastal social-ecological systems in the Mekong Delta. More intensive farming models increase economic risks and ecological damage to mangrove and coastal habitats, while extensive models better support sustainable livelihoods.
A critical review of microplastics in the shrimp farming environment: Incidence, characteristics, effects, and a first mass balance model
This review provides the first mass balance model for tracking how microplastics flow through shrimp farming systems, from water and feed inputs to accumulation in shrimp tissues and sediments. Researchers found that microplastics can act as carriers for other contaminants and accumulate in shrimp at levels that may pose risks to consumers. The study identifies critical knowledge gaps in understanding how aquaculture practices contribute to microplastic contamination in farmed seafood.
Microplastic toxicity in shrimp: From mechanistic pathways to ecological implications.
Researchers systematically reviewed 94 studies on microplastic toxicity in shrimp, mapping mechanistic pathways from particle characteristics to oxidative stress, immune dysfunction, neurotoxicity, and reproductive impairment across hepatopancreas, gills, gut, and gonad tissues, and identifying shrimp as effective bioindicators for aquatic microplastic risk assessment.
The occurrence of pollutants in organisms and water of inland mariculture systems: Shrimp aquaculture is a procession of Microplastics accumulation
This study examined microplastic contamination in water and shrimp at different stages of both pond-based and industrial inland aquaculture systems, finding that shrimp accumulated microplastics throughout the production cycle. The results establish shrimp aquaculture as a notable pathway for microplastic transfer into the food supply.
Abundance, characteristics and ecological risk assessment of microplastics in ship ballast water in ports around Liaodong Peninsula, China
This study assessed microplastic abundance, characteristics, and ecological risk in shrimp aquaculture environments, finding that farming activities introduce and accumulate microplastics in pond sediments and water that pose risk to cultured organisms.