0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Assessment of SPME lab-made microfibers for monitoring the presence of phthalate contaminants in honey sample

Journal of Food Measurement & Characterization 2024 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Bruno J. Botelli, Norma Tombesi, Verónica Lassalle

Summary

Researchers fabricated polyethylene-glycol-coated SPME microfibers and demonstrated their superior ability to separate and detect phthalate plasticizers — diethyl, dibutyl, and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate — in honey samples via GC-MS. Developing more sensitive detection tools for phthalates and related plastic-associated chemicals in food is essential, as these compounds leach from packaging into food and are linked to hormonal disruption in humans.

Polymers

The contamination with plastics (nano and micro) is a problem of great concern. In the case of food, the presence of plastics is ascribed to their use as packaging materials which can migrate into different foodstuffs. A need for more efficient and accessible detection techniques becomes a great challenge. In this context, Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) emerges as a highly efficient tool to assess the determination of analytes, including microplastics, in different kinds of matrix comprising foods. In this contribution, the design of SPME microfibers is proposed to assess the more efficient detection of phthalates, as model of microplastics, in a sample of honey. SPME microfibers were fabricated using vitreous materials and coated with polyethylene glycol (PEG). The characterization of coated microfibers was performed by FTIR SEM, and TGA. The achieved data confirmed that PEG deposited on the fiber, reached a maximum of 13% respect to the total coated fiber mass. The performance of developed fibers was evaluated using Gas Chromatography coupled with a Mass Spectrometer detector. The results revealed a better separation between the retention times (r.t) of each phthalate when the lab made fibers were employed. In the this case r.t of 23, 33 and 41 min were roughly achieved for detecting diethyl phthalate (DEP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP) and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), respectively. As a difference, when the commercial fiber was used the retention times were narrower distributed reaching r.t of 30, 33, and 39 min for DEP, DBP and DEHP, respectively in the same honey’s sample.

Share this paper