0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Safe-and-Sustainable-by-Design Framework: (Re-)Designing the Advanced Materials Lifecycle

Sustainability 2024 8 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Adamantia Kostapanou, Konstantina‐Roxani Chatzipanagiotou, Spyridon Damilos, Foteini Petrakli, Elias P. Koumoulos

Summary

This paper proposed a Safe-and-Sustainable-by-Design (SSbD) framework for redesigning advanced materials — including plastics and nanomaterials — to minimize hazards and environmental impacts from the earliest design stage. The framework integrates safety, environmental, and circularity criteria into materials development.

In the last few years, the materials research community has shown increased interest in Advanced Materials (AdMas) that are specifically designed to substitute the traditionally used materials, not only with a view to their sustainability, sourcing criticality, or scarcity, but also to maintaining or even enhancing their functionality and performance. The use of AdMas is particularly researched in sectors where the environmental impact of the traditional materials is substantial, in terms of waste production or resource consumption. Due to their novelty and potentially unpredictable impacts, and to add further value to their application, there is an increasing interest in the safety and sustainability of AdMas. In this context, a new 5-step Safe-and-Sustainable-by-Design (SSbD) framework was developed by the European Union, to support the (re-)design and development of novel materials. A guideline is presented for enforcing the (re-)design phase of the framework with paradigms to guide stakeholders and practically add value to the materials’ industry. The present manuscript analyzes the advances and challenges of the SSbD framework, showcasing its applicability and limitations and the added value compared to traditionally used assessment methodologies, to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the methodology and add value to the materials’ industry concerning safety and sustainability.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Safe by Design for Nanomaterials—Late Lessons from Early Warnings for Sustainable Innovation

This review examines the 'Safe by Design' framework for nanomaterials, arguing that early evaluation of potential toxicity risks during the innovation process — drawing on lessons from past environmental warnings — is essential for sustainable advanced material development.

Article Tier 2

Safe-and-Sustainable-by-Design  Approach and Decision Support System for Advanced Materials

Researchers developed a Safe-and-Sustainable-by-Design decision support system and framework for advanced materials, aligned with EU recommendations. The system guides innovators through a stage-gate model with tools for early-stage material assessment and warning flags, enabling systematic safety and sustainability evaluation from ideation through pilot development.

Article Tier 2

Curbing the Environmental Implications of Emerging Nano-Pollutants: Current Developments in Preventing Environmental Exposure Potential and Adverse Effects

This paper proposed two strategies for reducing the environmental exposure potential and adverse effects of engineered nanomaterials from nano-enabled products: a safer-and-sustainable-by-design (SSbD) approach during product development, and coordinated international policy development to regulate nanomaterial releases across product lifecycles.

Article Tier 2

First Steps Toward Sustainable Circular Uses of Chemicals: Advancing the Assessment and Management Paradigm

This article advances a framework for sustainable circular use of chemicals, proposing updated assessment and management approaches to reduce chemical hazards while enabling circularity in industrial and consumer product systems.

Article Tier 2

Release Assessment Methodology for Safe Sustainable and Recyclable by-Design Practices for Plastics: The Epoxy-Resin Composite Case Study

Researchers developed a release assessment methodology for epoxy resin composites to evaluate whether they meet safe and sustainable by-design criteria across their lifecycle. The framework tested for chemical release during manufacturing, use, and end-of-life, providing a standardized approach to green plastic design.

Share this paper