0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Safe-and-Sustainable-by-Design  Approach and Decision Support System for Advanced Materials

2025 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Susan Dekkers, Wendel Wohlleben Andrea Haase, Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Andrea Haase, Wendel Wohlleben Véronique Adam, Véronique Adam, Andrea Haase, Andrea Haase, Véronique Adam, Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Véronique Adam, Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Veronica De Battista, Wendel Wohlleben Veronica De Battista, Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Andrea Haase, Andrea Haase, Andrea Haase, Johannes Prinz, Susan Dekkers, Wendel Wohlleben Johannes Prinz, Wendel Wohlleben Gregor Nagel, Andrea Haase, Andrea Haase, Gregor Nagel, Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Wouter Fransman, Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Michael Persson, Wouter Fransman, Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Blanca Suárez-Merino, Andrea Haase, Andrea Haase, Andrea Haase, Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Andrea Haase, Andrea Haase, Andrea Haase, Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Otmar Schmid, Otmar Schmid, Eugene van Someren, Wendel Wohlleben Eugene van Someren, Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Otmar Schmid, Otmar Schmid, Otmar Schmid, Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben Wendel Wohlleben

Summary

Researchers developed a Safe-and-Sustainable-by-Design decision support system and framework for advanced materials, aligned with EU recommendations. The system guides innovators through a stage-gate model with tools for early-stage material assessment and warning flags, enabling systematic safety and sustainability evaluation from ideation through pilot development.

To facilitate Safe-and-Sustainable-by-Design (SSbD), the HARMLESS project developed a SSbD approach and Decision Support System (DSS) for advanced materials. The SSbD approach and DSS are in alignment with the EU recommended SSbD framework, tools and methods, including New Approach Methodologies (NAMs), and tailored to the innovation stage of the material under development. The SSbD approach follows a flexible stage-gate model with three innovation stages: 1) Ideation & Business Case Phase, 2) Lab Phase, and 3) Pilot Phase. The SSbD-DSS guides designers through a workflow starting with the Advanced Material Earliest Assessment (AMEA) tool. AMEA contains three questions enabling categorization and subsequently advice on design principles. A second tool, named Warning flags, design Advice, Screening Priorities (WASP) consists of twelve questions to identify early warning flags and provide design and assessment advice. A third tool, named Alternative SSbD Design Inspector (ASDI) provides guidance on descriptors to measure in the Lab Phase for informed decision making on the most optimal SSbD version. By adapting the data and resource requirements to each innovation stage, the SSbD-DSS facilitates practical implementation of SSbD, supporting the user to find a transparent balance between safety, sustainability and performance.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper