0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Environmental Sources Food & Water Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Glitters in fishing ground baits – A direct source of primary microplastics in soil and freshwater ecosystems

Chemosphere 2024 3 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Fishing bait pastes sold commercially contain glitter particles made of PET (polyethylene terephthalate), meaning anglers are directly and intentionally introducing primary microplastics into freshwater ecosystems during fishing activities. These glitter particles are designed to attract and be ingested by fish, efficiently inserting plastic into the food chain, and accelerated aging tests showed they remain durable in both saltwater and marine sediments. This is a previously overlooked but direct human-driven route for primary microplastic contamination of freshwater and marine environments.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

The aim of this paper is to draw attention to the direct source of primary microplastics (MPs) that have been entirely neglected so far, namely by providing qualitative studies of the fishing ground baits with glitters. Among many microplastic sources already detected in fishing and angling gear and reported in the literature, the glitters in synthetic pastry are the only primary source (produced <5 mm; P-MPs), with MPs placed directly into the freshwater, during sports competitions and individual leisure activities, and were so far not discussed. Dozens of different fishbait pastry products available on the market containing glitters were funded to represent, from the material point of view, only three different classes studied further. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR), ATR-FTIR and Raman spectroscopy combined with scanning electron microscopy with an energy-dispersive detector (SEM/EDS) enabled the characterization of their composition and morphology. Glitters are composite structures with an internal core and several chemical layers symmetrically placed on both sides. The polymer origin of particles, with the polyethylene terephthalate (PET) core, was confirmed as being an essential condition to classify them as P-MPs. One should focus on the fact that those primary microplastics are designed purposely to be particularly attractive and ingested by fishes, thus being efficiently introduced to the trophic chain with all persistent consequences, including their contribution to the plastisphere. The preliminary qualitative results of environmental stability were obtained in the accelerated ageing test to discuss the possible long-term ecological implications further. Glitters were durable in the saltwater (both natural and used for weathering in the ageing chamber) and in the seabed sediments. The primary weathering test was performed in marine environments, as oceans are the final destination of most freshwater MPs. Finally, suggestions for future studies to enlarge the knowledge about this issue are provided.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastic in angling baits as a cryptic source of contamination in European freshwaters

AI summary Read the abstract

This study identified recreational fishing bait as an overlooked source of microplastic pollution in European freshwaters. Commonly used baits including boilies and pellets contained significant plastic particles released into waterways during fishing, representing a widespread and poorly regulated pollution pathway.

Article Tier 2

Pêche récréative et fonctionnement des lacs : conséquences des pratiques d'amorçage et aide à la gestion opérationnelle

AI summary Read the abstract

A study of recreational fishing in French gravel-pit lakes found that two of three angling bait types tested contained microplastics at an average of 17.4 particles per kilogram. Some carp anglers were using over 4.6 kg of bait per day, meaning microplastics are being deliberately introduced into freshwater systems as a by-product of angling, on top of the significant nutrient pollution these baits also cause.

Article Tier 2

Tiny, shiny, and colorful microplastics: Are regular glitters a significant source of microplastics?

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers examined whether conventional glitter products made from polyethylene terephthalate represent a significant source of microplastic pollution, finding that their widespread use in cosmetics, crafts, and textiles makes them a notable but underexamined contributor to environmental microplastic contamination.

Article Tier 2

Glitter ingestion by bromeliad-dwelling macroinvertebrates: implications for freshwater microplastic contamination

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed macroinvertebrates living in bromeliad leaf reservoirs to glitter particles as a microplastic proxy, finding ingestion occurred across multiple taxa and that glitter persisted in the gut and environment longer than natural food particles.

Article Tier 2

All that glitters is litter? Ecological impacts of conventional versus biodegradable glitter in a freshwater habitat.

AI summary Read the abstract

A mesocosm experiment compared the effects of conventional PET glitter versus biodegradable alternatives (including modified cellulose and mica) on freshwater ecosystems, finding no significant effect on biodiversity but a reduction in algae photosynthesis from conventional glitter. The results suggest biodegradable glitter alternatives may be less harmful, though the effects of both types at higher concentrations or over longer periods remain unclear.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper