0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Reproductive & Development Sign in to save

Review on Accumulation and Fragmentation of Anthropogenic Materials On, in and Around Birds

AI summary Read the abstract

This review synthesized knowledge on the accumulation, fragmentation, and environmental fate of anthropogenic materials — including plastics, textiles, and rubber — in, on, and around beaches. It examined the multiple pathways by which these materials break down into micro- and nano-sized particles.

Anthropogenic material is worldwide issue and certainly a crucial threat for avian ecosystem. There are large number of avian species use anthropogenic debris in their nests. Anthropogenic material comprises plastic, foil, masks, cigarette butts, clothes pieces, etc. Fragmentation of plastic and cigarette butts cause lethal effect on physical fitness of birds. Breakdown of plastic into extremely small pieces and converts into micro plastics. Cigarette fragmentation which turns into cigarette litter and that damage the birds sustainability. Entanglement of plastic string in birds morphological structures and lead to difficulties in their existence, sometimes it cause lethal effect to the birds, that is debate in these present study. Mortality in birds by nestling is more to that area where the more anthropogenic debris present. The ingestion of micro plastics is directly effect on physiological functions of birds. Accumulation of micro plastics in birds gastrointestinal (digestive) and respiratory tract may results into deadly effect on birds. Cigarette litter accumulation also lead to consequential result on female birds fertility. The use of plastic debris in nest construction is one of the response of birds to plastic pollution, and the changes in the natural especially terrestrial environment may result in reduced availability of natural nestling material, it forcing individual birds to seek replacements. (Jagiello, Zuzanna, et al.2019)[1]. Urban areas with higher population density produce more plastic waste, as evidenced by city residents generating twice as much waste as their rural areas and it is happen by the extensive use of packaged products and increased food waste. (Wayman, Chloe, et al.2024)[2]. Quantifying the presence of plastic and other anthropogenic materials in the nests of these species over time can also serve as a useful indicator of plastic pollution in the environment and should be closely monitored. Therefore, in an increasing urbanization scenario, it becomes essential to raise public awareness on the potential consequences of the presence of anthropogenic waste in the environment. In addition, we encourage future studies focusing on the causes and consequences of the incorporation of anthropogenic materials in avian nests, with special emphasis on potential adverse consequences of their use. Girao, Joana, et al.(2024)[3]. Anthropogenic activities and human pressure affect on survival of avian species. Using anthropogenic debris by birds in their nest reflects the indicator and marker of global environmental pollution.

More Papers Like This

Meta Analysis Tier 1

Species-specific accumulation of microplastics in different bird species from South China: A comprehensive analysis

AI summary Read the abstract

Across 24 bird species in South China, insectivorous birds accumulated significantly more small microplastics (under 0.1 mm) than other feeding guilds, while piscivorous birds accumulated more large microplastics (over 1 mm). Diet source was a stronger predictor of microplastic contamination than trophic level or body weight, with polypropylene and PET as the dominant polymer types found.

Article Tier 2

Fate of plastic in the environment: From macro to nano by macrofauna.

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examines the role that animals themselves play in breaking large plastic items down into smaller fragments through feeding, digestion, and mechanical action. Researchers found that invertebrates, fish, birds, and mammals all contribute to physical fragmentation of plastics, accelerating the production of microplastics in the environment. The findings suggest that biological fragmentation is an underappreciated pathway in the plastic degradation cycle.

Review Tier 2

Microplastics and the Impact of Plastic on Wildlife: A Literature Review

AI summary Read the abstract

This review synthesizes evidence on microplastic ingestion and accumulation in seabirds and wildlife, examining the pathways by which microplastics move through marine food webs and the potential physiological harm to upper-trophic predators.

Article Tier 2

Differential microplastic contamination of waterbirds in a coastal region associated with trophic groups and spatial distribution

AI summary Read the abstract

A study of waterbird feces in southern Brazil found that shorebirds feeding in sediments had far higher microplastic loads than fish-eating birds, and contamination was worst near urban areas, with polyester and PVC the most common polymers detected. Trophic position and proximity to cities both shape how much plastic wildlife ingests, providing a natural monitoring system for tracking coastal microplastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics and terrestrial birds: a review on plastic ingestion in ecological linchpins

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers reviewed how microplastic pollution affects terrestrial birds — key ecological indicators — finding documented harms including intestinal blockage and developmental disruption, with implications for entire food webs since birds that ingest plastics can concentrate and transfer contamination to other species, including humans.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper