We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
LCA and Emergy Approach to Evaluate the Environmental Performance of Plastic Bags from Fossil and Renewable Sources with the Function of Conditioning MSW
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper is not relevant to microplastics research; it performs a life cycle assessment comparing the environmental impacts of plastic bags made from HDPE, LDPE, and thermoplastic starch for carrying goods and packing municipal waste, focusing on production emissions rather than microplastic pollution.
This study aimed to compare the environmental performance of plastic bags made of three different polymers, considering two product functions: carrying goods and packing municipal solid waste. The three polymers studied were HDPE, LDPE, and thermoplastic starch (TPS). Life cycle assessment and emergy accounting were used to evaluate the environmental performance of each scenario in analysis. To develop this research, eight scenarios were created to represent the customs of use and consumption in the Brazilian population. The LCA results showed that, in general, the scenarios with HDPE plastic bags presented the best environmental performances, while those with TPS presented the worst. The processes that contributed most to these results, representing 70% or more of the environmental impact in each impact category, are related to the use of raw materials, electricity, and water for the manufacture of plastic bags and the treatment in landfills. In other words, the fact that TPS has a mass around six times greater than that of HDPE and two times greater than that of LDPE ends up leaving this type of polymer with the worst environmental performance. In the comparative analysis of scenarios for the same polymer, scenarios that involve the use and reuse of plastic bags present the lowest potential environmental impacts. In contrast, those related to the use and disposal in landfills present the highest possible environmental impacts. The results of emergy accounting showed that the HDPE scenarios had the lowest total emergy flow, ranging from 1.77 × 1013 seJ to 2.40 × 1013 seJ. In contrast, the LDPE scenarios had the highest total emergy flow, ranging from 1.15 × 1014 to 1.21 × 1014 seJ. Although LDPE had the highest total emergy flow values, these results are similar to those obtained by the fossil resource scarcity impact category, which focuses on resource consumption analysis. Thus, through a real approach to the use of plastic bags and solid waste management in the Brazilian context, this study brings essential insights to direct public policies related to the consumption of plastic bags.
More Papers Like This
Paper Bags vis-à-vis LDPE Bags: Gleanings from Peer-reviewed E-LCA Publications
AI summary Read the abstract
A life-cycle analysis review comparing paper bags to low-density polyethylene (LDPE) plastic bags finds that paper bags generally have lower environmental impact across most categories, although LDPE performs better on water use metrics. The study touches on the microplastic problem as one reason to prefer paper, but its focus is broader environmental comparison rather than microplastic pollution specifically. The findings reinforce policy arguments for transitioning away from single-use plastic bags.
Environmental Evaluation of Chemical Plastic Waste Recycling: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper is not relevant to microplastics research; it performs a life cycle assessment of chemical recycling of plastic waste via pyrolysis in Spain, concluding the process produces lower carbon emissions than fossil diesel, but the focus is on industrial energy recovery rather than microplastic environmental impacts.
A critical review on plastic waste life cycle assessment and management: Challenges, research gaps, and future perspectives
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines the full environmental impact of plastics from production through disposal, noting that life cycle assessments often produce unexpected results when comparing bio-based and petroleum-based plastics. A major gap exists because microplastic pollution is not yet factored into these environmental assessments, despite growing evidence of its ecological harm.
Recycling of Plastics as a Strategy to Reduce Life Cycle GHG Emission, Microplastics and Resource Depletion
AI summary Read the abstract
This study quantified the environmental benefits of recycling widely consumed plastic polymers, demonstrating that increased plastic recycling significantly reduces life cycle greenhouse gas emissions, microplastic pollution, and resource depletion.
Plant species-specific impact of polyethylene microspheres on seedling growth and the metabolome
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers modeled the lifecycle of plastic packaging and estimated the generation of secondary microplastics from different disposal pathways including landfill, incineration, and recycling. Results indicate that recycling significantly reduces microplastic generation but does not eliminate it entirely.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.