0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Reproductive & Development Sign in to save

Life Cycle Assessment of Methanol Production from Municipal Solid Waste: Environmental Comparison with Landfilling and Incineration

Resources 2025 6 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 63 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Cristiano Queiroz Cerqueira, Electo Eduardo Silva Lora, Lidiane La Picirelli de Souza, Márcio Montagnana Vicente Leme, Regina Mambeli Barros, Osvaldo José Venturini

Summary

This study compared the environmental impact of converting municipal solid waste into methanol versus traditional landfilling or burning. The methanol production method reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 87% compared to landfilling. While not directly about microplastics, better waste management approaches like this could help reduce the amount of plastic entering the environment and eventually breaking down into microplastics.

Inadequate waste management strategies play a significant role in exacerbating environmental challenges, such as increased greenhouse gas emissions, resource depletion, and other adverse ecological impacts. These issues are aggravated by the global rise in municipal solid waste (MSW) generation, surpassing the rate of population growth. Simultaneously, there is an urgent demand for sustainable energy solutions to combat climate change and its wide-ranging impacts. In response, this study addresses a critical question: is methanol production from MSW, a waste-to-chemical (WtC) alternative based on circular economy principles, a more environmentally sustainable approach compared to traditional waste-to-energy (WtE) methods like landfilling with biogas recovery and incineration? To answer this, this study evaluates the environmental performance of MSW-to-methanol technologies using life cycle assessment (LCA), focusing on key indicators such as global warming potential, resource depletion, and impacts on human health and ecosystem quality. The results reveal that methanol production from MSW significantly reduces global warming potential (GWP) by 87% compared to landfilling and 56% compared to incineration. Additionally, the process demonstrates high energy efficiency in electricity generation, achieving 80% of the output of incineration. These findings position MSW-to-methanol as a promising alternative for advancing sustainable waste management and renewable energy transitions. While the technology is still in its developmental stages, this research highlights the need for further advancements and policy support to enhance feasibility and scalability. By providing a comparative environmental analysis, this study contributes to identifying innovative pathways for addressing pressing waste management and energy sustainability challenges.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Environmental Evaluation of Chemical Plastic Waste Recycling: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach

This paper is not relevant to microplastics research; it performs a life cycle assessment of chemical recycling of plastic waste via pyrolysis in Spain, concluding the process produces lower carbon emissions than fossil diesel, but the focus is on industrial energy recovery rather than microplastic environmental impacts.

Article Tier 2

LCA and Emergy Approach to Evaluate the Environmental Performance of Plastic Bags from Fossil and Renewable Sources with the Function of Conditioning MSW

This paper is not relevant to microplastics research; it performs a life cycle assessment comparing the environmental impacts of plastic bags made from HDPE, LDPE, and thermoplastic starch for carrying goods and packing municipal waste, focusing on production emissions rather than microplastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

Maximizing Environmental Impact Savings Potential through Innovative Biorefinery Alternatives: An Application of the TM-LCA Framework for Regional Scale Impact Assessment

This study evaluated the environmental savings potential of innovative biorefinery approaches for converting agricultural and organic waste into valuable products. It is a life cycle assessment paper on industrial ecology with no direct relevance to microplastics.

Article Tier 2

Recycling of Plastics as a Strategy to Reduce Life Cycle GHG Emission, Microplastics and Resource Depletion

This study quantified the environmental benefits of recycling widely consumed plastic polymers, demonstrating that increased plastic recycling significantly reduces life cycle greenhouse gas emissions, microplastic pollution, and resource depletion.

Article Tier 2

Upcycling Municipal Solid Waste to Polymers and Bioethanol

Scientists developed a new way to turn regular household trash into useful products like plastic materials and ethanol fuel, without needing to sort or clean the garbage first. This method could help reduce the massive amounts of waste going to landfills and incinerators, which often release harmful chemicals into the air and water that can affect human health. The process appears to be both economically viable and better for the environment than current waste disposal methods.

Share this paper