0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Characterizing nanoplastic suspensions of increasing complexity: inter-laboratory comparison of size measurements using dynamic light scattering

Open MIND 2025
Korinna Altmann, Korinna Altmann, Raquel Portela, Raquel Portela, Francesco Barbero, Francesco Barbero, Esther Breuninger, Esther Breuninger, Laura M. A. Camassa, Tanja Cirkovic Velickovic, Tanja Cirkovic Velickovic, Costas Charitidis, Anna Costa, Marta Fadda, Marta Fadda, Petra Fengler, Ivana Fenoglio, Ivana Fenoglio, Andrea M. Giovannozzi, Andrea M. Giovannozzi, Øyvind P. Haugen, Panagiotis Kainourgios, Frank von der Kammer, Frank von der Kammer, Markus J. Kirchner, Markus J. Kirchner, Madeleine Lomax-Vogt, Madeleine Lomax-Vogt, Tamara Lujic, Tamara Lujic, Frank Milczewski, Mhamad Aly Moussawi, Simona Ortelli, Simona Ortelli, Tatjana N. Parac‐Vogt, Annegret Potthoff, Annegret Potthoff, Julian J. Jimenez Reinosa, Sophie Röschter, Alessio Sacco, Lukas Wimmer, Lukas Wimmer, Ilaria Zanoni, Lea Ann Dailey, Lea Ann Dailey, :unav, :unav

Summary

An inter-laboratory comparison evaluated methods for characterizing nanoplastic suspensions of increasing complexity, highlighting the lack of well-characterized test materials as a major barrier to reliable nanoplastic toxicity studies. The study aimed to improve harmonization of nanoplastic size and property measurements across research groups.

Polymers

Understanding the potential human health risks associated with micro- and nanoplastic exposure is currently a priority research area. Nanoplastic toxicity studies are complicated by the lack of available, well-characterized test and reference materials. Further, many nanoplastic test materials are inherently more polydisperse and heterogenous in shape compared to polystyrene beads, making accurate and representative size distribution measurements particularly challenging. The aim of this study was to conduct an inter-laboratory comparison of dynamic light scattering measurements, the most commonly used particle sizing method for nanomaterials. Using a published standard operating procedure, size measurements in water and a standardized cell culture medium (CCM) were generated for spherical, carboxy-functionalized polystyrene nanoparticles (PS-COOH; 50 nm; benchmark material), and for increasingly complex in-house produced spherical poly(ethylene terephthalate) (nanoPET) and irregular-shaped polypropylene (nanoPP) test materials. The weighted mean of hydrodynamic diameters of PS-COOH dispersed in water (55 ± 5 nm) showed moderate variation between labs (coefficient of variation, CV = 8.2%) and were similar to literature reports. Measurements of nanoPET (82 ± 6 nm) and nanoPP (182 ± 12 nm) in water exhibited similar CV values (nanoPET: 7.3% and nanoPP; 6.8%). Dispersion of PS-COOH and nanoPET in CCM increased the CV to 15.1 and 14.2%, respectively, which is lower than literature reports (CV = 30%). We conclude with a series of practical recommendations for robust size measurements of nanoplastics in both water and complex media highlighting that strict adherence to a standard operating procedure is required to prevent particle agglomeration in CCM.

Share this paper