0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Thermodynamic Analysis of Protein-Nanoparticle Interactions Links Binding Affinity and Structural Stability

The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2026 Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Chathuri S. Kariyawasam, Radha P Somarathne, Naomi C. Hellard, T. H. Shaikh, Nicholas C. Fitzkee

Summary

Using model proteins with systematically altered surface charges, researchers showed that polystyrene nanoparticles destabilize protein structure upon contact, and that how strongly a protein binds to a nanoparticle surface predicts how much it will unfold. When nanoplastics enter biological fluids, they become coated in a protein 'corona' that determines how cells recognize and respond to them, so understanding the binding thermodynamics helps predict nanoplastic toxicity and biological behavior. This work builds a framework for forecasting which proteins are most vulnerable to disruption by nanoplastics—relevant to understanding their health effects.

Polymers

When nanoparticles and nanoplastics enter biological fluids, their surfaces are rapidly coated with proteins, forming a corona that governs biological responses. However, understanding protein-surface interaction energetics remains a significant challenge. Here, we examine how protein charge distribution affects adsorption to polystyrene nanoparticles (PSNPs) by generating a series of lysine-to-alanine variants of the GB3 protein. This approach is unique because it explores how systematic perturbations in a controlled model protein influence protein-surface interactions. Using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), we found that the K19A variant binds most strongly to both nonfunctionalized and carboxylate-functionalized PSNPs. ITC thermograms indicate that K19A forms a stable monolayer, while other variants exhibit multilayer adsorption. The folded protein structure suggests that removing lysine at position 19 creates a flatter, more neutral interaction surface that promotes efficient initial binding. Fluorescence denaturation experiments show that PSNPs destabilize GB3 protein variants, and the binding free energy correlates strongly with protein unfolding (r = 0.82, p < 0.01 for carboxylate-functionalized PSNPs and r = 0.76, p < 0.03 for nonfunctionalized PSNPs). These results reveal how protein stability and charge distribution shape adsorption thermodynamics, informing frameworks for predicting protein-surface interactions.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Thermodynamic Analysis of Protein-Nanoparticle Interactions Links Binding Affinity and Structural Stability

Researchers examined how protein charge distribution influences adsorption onto polystyrene nanoparticles by engineering a series of lysozyme variants and analyzing binding affinity through thermodynamic analysis. They found that electrostatic properties of proteins strongly govern corona formation kinetics and structural stability when nanoplastics enter biological fluids.

Article Tier 2

Modelling bionano interactions and potential health risks for environmental nanoplastics: the case of functionalized polystyrene

Researchers used computer simulations to model how proteins adsorb onto polystyrene nanoplastic surfaces, investigating bionano interactions relevant to potential health risks. The study focused on functionalized polystyrene as a model for environmental nanoplastics. The findings contribute to understanding how nanoplastics interact with biological molecules, which is important for evaluating their toxicological potential.

Article Tier 2

Mechanistic Insights into Cellular and Molecular Basis of Protein‐Nanoplastic Interactions

This review examines how nanoplastic particles interact with proteins at the cellular and molecular level, disrupting normal protein function and triggering oxidative stress, DNA damage, and cell death. Researchers found that nanoplastics alter the structural shape of important proteins, which helps explain their toxic effects on living organisms. The study also covers how understanding these protein-plastic interactions could inform both toxicity assessment and potential enzymatic plastic degradation strategies.

Article Tier 2

Structure of soft and hard protein corona around polystyrene nanoplastics—Particle size and protein types

Researchers characterized the protein corona that forms around polystyrene nanoplastics of different sizes, finding that particle size influences which proteins bind and how tightly, with implications for nanoplastic toxicity and biological uptake.

Article Tier 2

Nanoplastics can change the secondary structure of proteins

Researchers found that nanoplastic particles interact directly with proteins and fundamentally alter their secondary structure, effectively denaturing them in a manner that could cause cellular and ecological damage. The study presents the first direct evidence that plastic-protein interactions represent a distinct and potentially serious biological hazard beyond the previously studied effects of microplastic ingestion.

Share this paper