0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Current Status of Emerging Contaminant Models and Their Applications Concerning the Aquatic Environment: A Review

Water 2025 18 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 58 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Zhuang Liu, Yonghai Gan, Jun Luo, Xiao Luo, Chengcheng Ding, Yibin Cui

Summary

This review categorizes the various computer models used to predict how emerging contaminants, including microplastics and pharmaceuticals, behave in aquatic environments. Researchers compared conventional water quality models, multimedia fugacity models, and machine learning approaches, finding that machine learning models offer the most versatility for tasks like contaminant identification and risk assessment. The study highlights that while modeling capabilities have advanced rapidly, gaps remain in applying these tools to real-world water pollution scenarios.

Increasing numbers of emerging contaminants (ECs) detected in water environments require a detailed understanding of these chemicals’ fate, distribution, transport, and risk in aquatic ecosystems. Modeling is a useful approach for determining ECs’ characteristics and their behaviors in aquatic environments. This article proposes a systematic taxonomy of EC models and addresses gaps in the comprehensive analysis of EC models and their applications. The reviewed models include conventional water quality models, multimedia fugacity models, and machine learning (ML) models. Conventional water quality models have higher prediction accuracy and spatial resolution; nevertheless, they are limited in functionality and can only be used to predict contaminant concentrations in aquatic environments. Fugacity models are excellent at depicting how contaminants travel between different environmental media, but they cannot be used directly to analyze contaminant variations in different parts of the same environmental media because the fugacity model assumes that contaminant concentrations are constant within the same environmental compartment. Compared to other models, ML models can be applied to more scenarios, such as contaminant identification and risk assessments, rather than being confined to the prediction of contaminant concentrations. In recent years, with the rapid development of artificial intelligence, ML models have surpassed fugacity models and conventional water quality models, becoming one of the newest hotspots in the study of ECs. The primary challenge faced by ML models is that the model outcomes are difficult to interpret and understand, and this influences the practical value of an ML model to some extent.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Current applications and future impact of machine learning in emerging contaminants: A review

This review examines how machine learning is being applied to emerging contaminant research including microplastics, covering identification, environmental behavior prediction, bioeffect assessment, and removal optimization of these pollutants.

Article Tier 2

In Silico Analysis of Contaminant Persistence: From QSARs to Machine Learning Models

Researchers reviewed six decades of computational approaches for predicting environmental persistence of contaminants, tracing the evolution from classical QSAR models to modern machine learning methods, and proposed a practical roadmap for applying these tools to small molecules, polymers, and microplastics in decision-ready regulatory contexts.

Article Tier 2

A novel modeling approaches to understand the fate and transport of microplastics in aquatic environment

This paper reviews novel modeling approaches for simulating microplastic fate and transport in aquatic environments, arguing that process-based and data-driven models are needed to complement field monitoring and improve risk assessments.

Article Tier 2

Advances in aquatic toxicology for predicting effects of multiple pollutants on aquatic organisms

This review examines advances in aquatic toxicology for predicting how mixtures of contaminants — heavy metals, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and microplastics — interact in aquatic organisms, highlighting computational modeling and mixture toxicity approaches as key tools for environmental risk assessment.

Article Tier 2

Mathematical modeling of microplastic abundance, distribution, and transport in water environments: A review

This review surveys mathematical models used to predict how microplastics move through and accumulate in rivers and oceans. Researchers categorized existing approaches by environment type and modeling method, identifying strengths and gaps in current simulation tools. The study highlights the need for better models that account for real-world complexity, including particle fragmentation and biofouling, to improve predictions of where microplastics end up.

Share this paper