0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Exploring Innovative Approaches for the Analysis of Micro- and Nanoplastics: Breakthroughs in (Bio)Sensing Techniques

Biosensors 2025 41 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 73 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Denise Margarita Rivera-Rivera, Gabriela Elizabeth Quintanilla-Villanueva, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Denise Margarita Rivera-Rivera, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Gabriela Elizabeth Quintanilla-Villanueva, Gabriela Elizabeth Quintanilla-Villanueva, Donato Luna-Moreno, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Juan Francisco Villarreal-Chiu, Juan Francisco Villarreal-Chiu, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Araceli Sánchez-Álvarez, Donato Luna-Moreno, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Araceli Sánchez-Álvarez, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Garima Kaushik Araceli Sánchez-Álvarez, Melissa Marlene Rodríguez-Delgado, Donato Luna-Moreno, Donato Luna-Moreno, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Araceli Sánchez-Álvarez, Araceli Sánchez-Álvarez, Araceli Sánchez-Álvarez, Araceli Sánchez-Álvarez, Araceli Sánchez-Álvarez, Juan Francisco Villarreal-Chiu, Gabriela Elizabeth Quintanilla-Villanueva, Gabriela Elizabeth Quintanilla-Villanueva, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Juan Francisco Villarreal-Chiu, José Manuel Rodríguez-Delgado, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, José Manuel Rodríguez-Delgado, Juan Francisco Villarreal-Chiu, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Garima Kaushik Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Melissa Marlene Rodríguez-Delgado, Melissa Marlene Rodríguez-Delgado, Donato Luna-Moreno, Garima Kaushik Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Juan Francisco Villarreal-Chiu, Juan Francisco Villarreal-Chiu, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Garima Kaushik Garima Kaushik Juan Francisco Villarreal-Chiu, Juan Francisco Villarreal-Chiu, Juan Francisco Villarreal-Chiu, Erika Iveth Cedillo-González, Melissa Marlene Rodríguez-Delgado, Melissa Marlene Rodríguez-Delgado, Garima Kaushik

Summary

This review covers new sensing technologies, including electrochemical and optical biosensors, being developed to detect microplastics and nanoplastics more quickly and affordably than current lab methods. Better detection tools are essential because understanding how much plastic pollution exists in the environment and in our bodies is the first step toward addressing the health risks.

Polymers

Plastic pollution, particularly from microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs), has become a critical environmental and health concern due to their widespread distribution, persistence, and potential toxicity. MPs and NPs originate from primary sources, such as cosmetic microspheres or synthetic fibers, and secondary fragmentation of larger plastics through environmental degradation. These particles, typically less than 5 mm, are found globally, from deep seabeds to human tissues, and are known to adsorb and release harmful pollutants, exacerbating ecological and health risks. Effective detection and quantification of MPs and NPs are essential for understanding and mitigating their impacts. Current analytical methods include physical and chemical techniques. Physical methods, such as optical and electron microscopy, provide morphological details but often lack specificity and are time-intensive. Chemical analyses, such as Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy, offer molecular specificity but face challenges with smaller particle sizes and complex matrices. Thermal analytical methods, including pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC-MS), provide compositional insights but are destructive and limited in morphological analysis. Emerging (bio)sensing technologies show promise in addressing these challenges. Electrochemical biosensors offer cost-effective, portable, and sensitive platforms, leveraging principles such as voltammetry and impedance to detect MPs and their adsorbed pollutants. Plasmonic techniques, including surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), provide high sensitivity and specificity through nanostructure-enhanced detection. Fluorescent biosensors utilizing microbial or enzymatic elements enable the real-time monitoring of plastic degradation products, such as terephthalic acid from polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Advancements in these innovative approaches pave the way for more accurate, scalable, and environmentally compatible detection solutions, contributing to improved monitoring and remediation strategies. This review highlights the potential of biosensors as advanced analytical methods, including a section on prospects that address the challenges that could lead to significant advancements in environmental monitoring, highlighting the necessity of testing the new sensing developments under real conditions (composition/matrix of the samples), which are often overlooked, as well as the study of peptides as a novel recognition element in microplastic sensing.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper