We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
The impact of government subsidies on microplastic pollution control in mariculture: an evolutionary game theory analysis in Qingdao, China
Summary
Using evolutionary game theory, researchers modeled interactions among fishing gear enterprises, fishermen, and government in Qingdao, China, finding that targeted government subsidies can effectively shift stakeholder strategies toward reducing microplastic pollution from mariculture fishing gear.
Mariculture constitutes the primary origin of microplastic pollution, necessitating immediate action to address microplastic pollution by focusing on both the supply and demand aspects of fishing gear. Based on the cooperative management model of mariculture microplastic pollution, this paper develops an evolutionary game model that incorporates the interactions among fishing gear enterprises, fishermen, and the government. It then proceeds to examine the government’s strategy for managing mariculture microplastic pollution through game theory and simulation analysis. The main findings obtained are as follows. (1) The management of mariculture microplastic pollution can be improved on both the supply chain and market aspects by implementing subsidies. The likelihood of receiving government subsidies boosts the production of environmentally-friendly fishing gear by fishing gear enterprises and the purchase of such gear by fishermen. (2) Based on the cost-benefit variations for fishing gear enterprises, fishermen, and the government, the evolutionary game model reaches distinct equilibrium states, leading to corresponding adjustments in the optimal government subsidy strategy. (3) While there are some positive effects of subsidies, increasing government subsidies does not necessarily lead to better outcomes. As the total amount of subsidies increases, the best practice for governments would be to phase out subsidies for environmentally-friendly fishing gear. Accordingly, the government should build a multi-subject collaborative governance model, reasonably control subsidies amount, prevent the adverse consequences of excessive subsidies, and optimize the structure of subsidy recipients.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Analyzing the evolutionary game of subsidies’ strategy in the digitization of marine ranch: a theoretical framework
Researchers used evolutionary game theory to model the strategic behavior of governments and manufacturers in digitizing marine plastic waste management, evaluating how subsidy structures affect adoption of digital tracking and reporting systems. Findings showed that well-designed subsidies could shift equilibrium toward widespread adoption of digital waste management, improving plastic pollution accountability.
Evolution strategies for collaborative governance of marine microplastic pollution from the industry-research integration perspective
Using evolutionary game theory, this study modeled how polluting companies, research institutions, and environmental organizations interact in governing marine microplastic pollution, finding that strong and sustained financial penalties are the most effective policy lever for getting industry to comply. The model also revealed that government credibility and the engagement of research institutions are critical — without them, even stiff fines may fail to produce lasting change.
Fishermen’s Preferences for Ecological Policies and Behavior Analysis: A Case Study of Weihai City, China
This paper is not relevant to microplastics research; it analyzes Chinese fishermen's policy preferences for fishery ecological protection using choice experiments and economic modeling, with no focus on plastic pollution.
Promoting digital transformation in facility agriculture: the role of government policies and digital literacy
Despite its title referencing facility agriculture and digital transformation, this paper studies government policy, subsidies, and digital literacy as drivers of technology adoption in modern farming operations — not microplastic pollution. It uses evolutionary game theory to model decision-making among farmers, governments, and consumers and is not relevant to microplastics or human health.
Fishing for Litter: Creating an Economic Market for Marine Plastics in a Sustainable Fisheries Model
Researchers developed a dynamic economic optimization model to examine how marine litter creates inefficiencies in the fisheries sector, showing that when the negative externality of marine litter is ignored, fish harvest increases while ocean quality deteriorates. The study explored a hypothetical 'fishing-for-litter' market mechanism as an incentive scheme that could align fishermen's economic interests with marine litter removal.