We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Macroinvertebrate colonisation of macroplastic litter in minimally disturbed river sites, Eastern Cape, South Africa
Summary
This South African study looked at whether macroplastic litter in streams could be colonized by aquatic invertebrates in the same way that natural materials like leaves and rocks are. Over six months, invertebrates colonized plastic substrates at similar overall levels to natural ones, but in slow-moving pool habitats, natural substrates supported greater species diversity. The dominant invertebrate species were present across all substrate types throughout the study. The findings suggest that while plastic in streams does not entirely replace natural habitat, it may reduce biodiversity in certain flow conditions — with potential cascading effects on freshwater ecosystems.
Abstract Macroplastic pollution remains a growing global environmental concern, and our understanding of its interaction with aquatic organisms is underdeveloped. It is also less clear how hydraulic biotopes influence macroinvertebrates colonisation of macroplastic relative to natural substrates. We investigated temporal and spatial patterns of macroinvertebrate colonisation on macroplastic litters in contrasting stream hydraulic biotopes (riffle, pool, and run) in minimally impacted headwater streams of Eastern Cape, South Africa. Plastic substrates of different proportions of natural and plastic litter were deployed across four sites. The Substrate group included 100% natural substrates (NS), 50% natural material and 50% plastic litters (NP), and 100% plastic (PD) litters. Each substrate group was deployed in riffle, pool, and run habitats for six months at each site. Across hydraulic biotopes, macroinvertebrate colonised substrate groups equally (PERMANOVA, p > 0.05). Macroinvertebrate diversity indices were statistically different across substrate groups in pools but not in other hydraulic habitats (PERMANOVA, p < 0.05). We observed that NS had significantly higher macroinvertebrate Margalef’s richness, Shannon, and Simpson diversity values than macroplastic substrates in pools. This difference suggests that specific-hydraulic biotope characteristics, such as sediment accretion and stream discharge, influence macroinvertebrate diversities. However, the dominant taxa had a marked presence in all substrate groups within hydraulic biotopes throughout the study, resulting in temporal variance that was not significant. Our findings highlight the importance of hydraulic biotope influence on macroinvertebrate colonisation of macroplastic substrates. It also provides a baseline for further research involving riverine macroplastic pollution.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Microplastics and riverine macroinvertebrate communities in a multiple-stressor context: A mesocosm approach
Researchers conducted a seven-week experiment using streamside channels to study how microplastics of different sizes and concentrations affect freshwater invertebrate communities, both alone and combined with fine sediment. They found that microplastic effects on invertebrate abundance and community composition were generally modest compared to the well-known impacts of sediment pollution. The study suggests that in real-world streams facing multiple stressors, microplastics may not be the dominant threat to bottom-dwelling organisms.
The microplastic profile of an urban African stream
Microplastics were detected in water, sediment, and chironomid larvae in the Braamfontein Spruit urban stream in Johannesburg, South Africa, with weirs and areas of reduced flow increasing local accumulation in sediment and invertebrates. The study demonstrates that urban stream features can concentrate microplastics and increase exposure for benthic organisms.
Contrasting Microplastic Characteristics in Macroinvertebrates from Two Independent but Adjacent Rivers in Kruger National Park, South Africa
Researchers investigated microplastics in benthic macroinvertebrates — including filter feeders, predators, and grazers — from the Olifants and Sabie rivers in Kruger National Park, finding an average of 1.0 MPs per organism and significantly higher burdens in filter feeders (8.8/organism) and predators (8.5/organism) than in grazers.
Preliminary indoor evidences of microplastic effects on freshwater benthic macroinvertebrates
Researchers exposed caddisfly and mayfly larvae to various microplastic polymers in laboratory experiments and found that caddisflies incorporated microplastics into their rebuilt cases and mayflies preferentially burrowed in microplastic substrates over natural ones. The study suggests that freshwater macroinvertebrates may not perceive microplastics as a direct threat, raising concerns about chronic exposure effects in heavily contaminated waterways.
Microcosm on a bottle: experimental tests on the colonization of plastic and glass substrates in a retention reservoir
This experiment compared how aquatic organisms colonized plastic versus glass bottle substrates in a Polish reservoir, finding differences in the diversity and composition of communities. The study provides insight into how plastic surfaces create distinct ecological niches compared to natural materials in freshwater environments.