0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Food & Water Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Don't take this lying down: an urgent wakeup call: the weight of diet and lifestyle in the young‐onset colorectal cancer surge

AI summary Read the abstract

This editorial discusses the rise of young-onset colorectal cancer (YO-CRC) in developed nations, noting that CRC is projected to become the leading cause of cancer mortality in those aged 20–49 by 2030, and examines the role of diet, lifestyle, and environmental factors including potential contributions from microplastics. It calls for urgent research and preventive action targeting modifiable risk factors in young adults.

Body Systems
Models

The overall decline in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in developed nations is overshadowed by a worrying anomaly: a rise in young-onset colorectal cancer (YO-CRC), broadly accepted as CRC diagnosed in patients under the age of 50. Currently, about 10–12% of all new diagnoses of CRC are in patients under 50.1, 2 Projections suggest that by 2030, YO-CRC would account for a quarter of all rectal cancers.3 Additionally, YO-CRC is projected to become the leading cause of cancer related mortality in those aged 20–49 by 2030.4 Locally, Australia and New Zealand have some of highest age standardized incidence rates of CRC in the world.5 YO-CRCs are more often left sided, and present at more advanced stages of disease, with a delayed time to diagnosis. They are also more likely to present with synchronous metastases.3 Studies show that about two thirds of YO-CRCs have seen at least two physicians before being correctly diagnosed, with over 40% waiting at least 6 months after experiencing symptoms before seeking medical attention.6 Some studies suggest YO-CRCs demonstrate more aggressive histopathological subtypes, such as mucinous adenocarcinoma and signet ring pathology.3, 5, 7 Genetics do provide some clues, but its exact impact is unclear. YO-CRC patients are almost twice as likely to have pathogenic variants (17%–25%), with about half due to mutations in lynch syndrome genes. The significance of the other pathogenic variants and its relation to CRC is unclear.8 The role of low-moderate penetrance variants, and their gene-environmental interactions, particularly early in life is an area of ongoing research. A positive family history of CRC in at least one first degree relative is reported in up to 30% of YO-CRCs.1 In keeping with the concept of the birth cohort effect, issues such as obesity, sedentary lifestyle and dietary changes have seen major shifts in recent decades. This is in line with a similar increase in YO-CRC rates across successive birth cohorts. Obesity and the metabolic syndrome are associated with a significantly increased relative risk for CRC. The Nurses Health Study II reported a significantly higher relative risk for CRC based on BMI, with an incrementally higher risk in obese compared to overweight patients. Childhood obesity sadly has seen a 200% rise since the 1960s.9 Similarly, sedentary jobs and lifestyle, which have increased over 80% since the 1950s have been shown to render a significantly increased relative risk for YO-CRC, particularly rectal cancer.10 The metabolic syndrome, with its associated conditions (hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, hyperglycaemia) are strongly associated with an increased risk of YO-CRC, with incrementally increased odds with each additional component of the metabolic syndrome.11 Consumption of sugary beverages have similarly been associated with an increased relative risk for YO-CRC, with an increasing risk based on consumption.12 One of the pivotal advances in recent years has been the recognition that the gut microbiome plays a central role in the development of CRC. Bacteria such a fusobacterium species, bacteroides fragiles, pks+ E. Coli, salmonella enterica are strongly associated with CRC carcinogenesis through a variety of mechanisms.13, 14 Overuse of antibiotics in recent years is a growing health concern. Additionally, epidemiological studies support an association between antibiotic exposure and development of CRC. The general theory is that antibiotic usage early in life perturbs the gut microbiome, with possible loss of protective microbiota early in life. This alteration in the microbiome may contribute to pro-inflammatory and pro-carcinogenic consequences, which may predispose individuals to YO-CRC.5 The concept of the exposome has also come to the fore in recent years. The notion of the exposome suggests that environmental factors that have seen a similar temporal trend to YO-CRC over time and potentially alter the gut microbiome contribute to the development of YO-CRC.14 It is likely a complex interplay wherein exposure to exposomal elements such as the westernized diet, red and processed meat in conjunction with other events early in life like exposure to antibiotics, synthetic dyes, microplastics alter the gut microbiome in childhood. The altered microbiome early in life along with ongoing exposure to environmental factors such as obesity through childhood and adolescence causes alterations in gut immunity and inflammation and likely confer an increased risk of developing YO-CRC to individuals with underlying genetic susceptibility.9, 10 The causative factors contributing to YO-CRC are no doubt complex. The growing tide in YO-CRC has led to several countries, including Australia to lower the screening age to 45. A more holistic examination of environmental influences from early in life is needed to help understand and address risk reduction in YO-CRC. There remains ongoing research into areas such as understanding gene-environmental interactions, susceptibility of the gut to carcinogenic exposures at various ages, role of microbiome and inflammation, with ongoing prospective projects such as GUTS, ORIGINS project in progress. The coming years will hopefully offer more insights into better understanding the key drivers and implementation of preventative strategies in dealing with YO-CRC. Open access publishing facilitated by Monash University, as part of the Wiley - Monash University agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Why Is Colorectal Cancer Occurring Earlier? Metabolic Dysfunction, Underrecognized Carcinogens, and Emerging Controversies

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers reviewed the rising incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer in people under 50, synthesizing epidemiological, molecular, and multi-omics evidence that implicates metabolic dysfunction, accelerated epigenetic aging, gut microbiome dysbiosis, and modern environmental exposures including micro- and nanoplastics as converging contributors to this trend.

Article Tier 2

Could Microplastics Be a Driver for Early Onset Colorectal Cancer?

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper explores whether microplastics could be contributing to the rising rates of colorectal cancer in people under 50. The timing of this increase lines up with the mass production of plastics starting in the 1950s, and microplastics are known to disrupt the gut lining and interact with gut bacteria in ways that could promote cancer. While not proven, the authors argue this connection deserves urgent research given how much plastic humans now ingest.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics and the Rising Tide of Early‐Onset Colorectal Cancer: Exploring the Environmental Gut Connection

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper explores the potential connection between microplastic exposure and the rising rates of early-onset colorectal cancer. The study discusses how microplastics may interact with the gut environment, suggesting that further research is needed to understand whether environmental microplastic contamination could be contributing to this emerging health trend.

Article Tier 2

Early-onset colorectal cancer in Australia: environmental, microbial, and policy implications

AI summary Read the abstract

Colorectal cancer in people under 50 is rising sharply in Australia, and this review pulls together research suggesting it's not mainly due to genetics or classic risk factors like poor diet and inactivity alone. Instead, scientists suspect a mix of gut bacteria changes (including toxin-producing E. coli), heavy antibiotic use early in life, and everyday chemical exposures like microplastics and PFAS ("forever chemicals") may be damaging the gut lining and DNA over time. This matters because it points to potentially preventable causes hiding in our environment and food supply, and it's a call for earlier screening

Article Tier 2

Orally Ingested Micro- and Nano-Plastics: A Hidden Driver of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Colorectal Cancer.

AI summary Read the abstract

This review synthesizes evidence linking ingested micro- and nano-plastics to inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer risk, proposing that microplastics act as a hidden driver of gut inflammation in vulnerable populations. The authors argue that intestinal accumulation of microplastics triggers immune and oxidative stress pathways that contribute to disease progression.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper