We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Exploring the phytotoxicity mechanisms of PET nanoplastics and 6:2 FTSA in water hyacinth under individual and combined exposure scenarios
AI summary Read the abstract
This study examined how PET nanoplastics interact with a common industrial chemical substitute (6:2 FTSA) in water hyacinth plants. The combination of pollutants caused more severe stress to the plants than either one alone, suppressing photosynthesis and forcing the plants to redirect energy toward self-defense. While focused on aquatic plants, the findings are relevant because they show how microplastics combined with other pollutants can amplify environmental damage in waterways.
Due to its similarity in hydrophobic properties to perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonic acid (6:2 FTSA) has emerged as a key substitute for PFOS. Its presence in aquatic environments, along with the coexistence of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), may impact the growth of aquatic plants and ecosystem stability. This study explored the changes in antioxidant defense, photosynthetic system, and metabolic responses of water hyacinths (Eichhornia crassipes) under individual and combined exposure conditions. The results indicated that water hyacinth efficiently accumulated 6:2 FTSA, with notably higher accumulation levels in leaves compared to roots, leading to a more pronounced stress response in leaves. The contents of nitrate, nitrite, ammonium, and the activities of nitrogen assimilation enzymes in leaves increased significantly, which in turn boosted the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavengers such as glutamic acid and glutathione, as well as antioxidant defense enzymes. Meanwhile, leaf photosynthesis was significantly suppressed due to the resource reallocation. This was corroborated by disruptions in the chloroplast thylakoid structure and alterations in chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. Metabolomics analysis further revealed that the contents of monosaccharides and organic acids decreased markedly, whereas amino acid levels increased significantly, suggesting that water hyacinths prioritized antioxidant defense mechanisms at the expense of growth. Additionally, we observed that the phytotoxic effects of 6:2 FTSA were exacerbated in the presence of PET nanoplastics, with the aforementioned indicators exhibiting synergistic effects. This study provides phenotypic, physiological, metabolic, and transcriptional insights into the toxic effects of the coexistence of PET nanoplastics and 6:2 FTSA on water hyacinths, offering toxicological data (e.g., oxidative stress markers and gene expression profiles) for assessing the environmental risks associated with emerging contaminants and proposing management strategies.
More Papers Like This
The bioaccumulation and ecotoxicity of co-exposure of per(poly)fluoroalkyl substances and polystyrene microplastics to Eichhornia crassipes
AI summary Read the abstract
This study found that when microplastics and forever chemicals (PFAS) coexist in water, the microplastics increase how much PFAS accumulates in water hyacinth plants and worsen the toxic effects compared to PFAS exposure alone. The finding is relevant to human health because it shows microplastics can amplify the harmful effects of other pollutants already present in the environment.
Single and combined effects of polystyrene nanoplastics and Cd on submerged plants Ceratophyllum demersum L.
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers studied the combined effects of nanoplastics and cadmium, a toxic heavy metal, on the aquatic plant Ceratophyllum demersum. They found that nanoplastics worsened cadmium's harmful effects on plant growth, photosynthesis, and cellular health, reducing growth rates by over 35%. The study suggests that when nanoplastics and heavy metals co-occur in water, their combined impact on aquatic plants may be more severe than either pollutant alone.
Microplastics and co-pollutant with ciprofloxacin affect interactions between free-floating macrophytes
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found that polyethylene microplastics and ciprofloxacin co-pollutants altered competitive interactions between free-floating macrophytes, with combined exposure affecting plant growth and physiological responses differently than individual pollutant exposure.
Toxic effects of microplastics and nanoplastics on plants: A global meta-analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
This meta-analysis of 101 studies found that micro- and nanoplastics negatively affect plant physiology, with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) showing the strongest impact on fresh weight, chlorophyll, and reactive oxygen species. Microplastics inhibited most growth and photosynthetic indicators more strongly than nanoplastics, and exposure consistently triggered increased biochemical stress enzyme activity.
Single and combined toxicity effects of microplastics and perfluorooctanoic acid on submerged macrophytes and biofilms
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested the combined effects of four common microplastic types and PFOA (a forever chemical) on aquatic plants and their associated biofilms. The pollutants together caused more damage to plant growth, photosynthesis, and microbial communities than either pollutant alone. Since microplastics and PFOA frequently co-occur in the environment, their combined toxic effects on aquatic ecosystems could have downstream consequences for water quality and human exposure.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.