0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Microplastics in soils: A comparative review on extraction, identification and quantification methods

Journal of Environmental Management 2025 22 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 73 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Pingan Song, Yoonjung Seo, Guangnan Chen, Yunru Lai, Shaobin Wang, Venkata Chevali, Zhezhe Zhou, Paulomi Burey

Summary

This review compares the various methods scientists use to extract, identify, and measure microplastics in soil, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Soil is a particularly challenging material to work with because its organic matter and complex structure can interfere with accurate microplastic detection. The authors recommend combining multiple techniques and minimizing harsh chemical steps that could accidentally destroy the very plastic particles being measured.

Microplastics (MPs) have been continuously accumulating in soil, posing significant environmental concerns due to their potential toxicity and role as pollutant vectors. Effective monitoring of MPs in soils requires appropriate methods for extraction, identification and quantification. This comparative review systematically examined various methods used in MP analysis from solid matrix environments, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each technique. Soils are heterogeneous and complex matrices, which can interact differently with MPs, rendering the separation of MPs from soils a significant challenge. Key challenges include the interactions between MPs and soil organic matter and detection limitations of smaller size MP which can interfere with accurate extraction. Specialized techniques and devices are required for precise identification and quantification. Digestion can be effective in removing organic matter, although harsh digestion can degrade MPs. To improve the liability of MP analysis, it is critical to minimize steps that may reduce accuracy such as filtration, harsh digestion and inappropriate sample size. Conversely, adjusting or combining methods can enhance the precision of MP analysis. This review offers a forward-looking perspective by advocating extraction and detection approaches, thus providing a more accurate, reproducible and holistic framework for MP analysis in soils. These insights are anticipated to guide future research promote standardized protocols and enhance environmental monitoring efforts.

Share this paper

Discussion

Log in to join the discussion

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.