0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Atmospheric microplastics and the human lungs

Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) 2025 Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Lauren Jenner

Summary

This review examines atmospheric microplastics—their known concentrations, types, sizes, and shapes in the air—and assesses the potential for human inhalation and associated health consequences. It identifies major standardization gaps that prevent direct comparison of datasets and calls for coordinated research to understand which MP types pose the greatest inhalation risk to human lungs.

Microplastics (MPs) are an emerging environmental contaminant (EEC), that have recently been isolated from samples collected from the atmosphere, and are considered ubiquitous on Earth. There is a lack of knowledge regarding the properties of atmospheric MPs (AMPs), in terms of location, concentrations, plastic types, sizes and shapes. There is also limited understanding of the potential for these MPs to be inhaled, and the consequences of such exposure. Standardised approaches throughout the AMP field are called for, because incomparable datasets and varying microplastic (MP) definitions are slowing down the progression of research. It is now necessary to thoroughly investigate AMPs, and gain knowledge of the location and MP types relevant to human exposure, as well as assessing MP inhalation as an exposure route for humans. This information can direct future investigations into the potential hazards associated with AMP inhalation.This thesis presents 3 publications, within this publication style thesis; investigating indoor AMPs, outdoor AMPs and a final investigation into the presence of MPs within human lung tissue samples, acquired from living patients.First, passive sampling of 20 households over a 6-month discontinuous duration, reported an average concentration of 1414 MP m− 2 day− 1 ± 1022 (mean ± SD). This high abundance of MPs within household environments supports the importance of indoor MP sampling locations. Fibrous and fragmented Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), Polypropylene (PP) and Nylon were also stated as relevant to human exposure, at head height.Secondly, passive sampling within a busy outdoor urban roadside location reported concentrations of MPs; 3055 ± 5072 MP m−2 day−1 (mean ± SD, 1164 median), over a yearlong investigation. Specific outdoor areas of high human activity were suggested to rival that of indoor concentrations. An additional snap-shot 2-week investigation, passively sampling 5 different areas of varying human activity, was also conducted. Roadside, commercial and industrial locations were reported with high concentration rates and relevance to human exposure. An abundance of film and fragmented particles, of Polyethylene (PE), Nylon and Resin composition, suggested these properties to be most relevant to human health studies.Finally, digested human lung tissue analysis provided evidence to support the human inhalation of MPs. 39 MPs were identified within 13 lung tissue samples, acquired from 11 living human patients. PP was reported within samples, after strict limit of detection and limit of quantification (LOD LOQ) adjustments were applied. PP, PET and Resin synthetic plastic types, and fibre and fragment shape categories were identified and suggested to be of relevance to human inhalation. The size of most MPs identified within lung tissue samples were larger than that thought possible to inhale, whilst some were smaller and traditionally more inhalable.These publications bridge environmental MP research and human MP health studies, providing much needed knowledge regarding the concentration and types of AMPs that humans are most likely exposed to on a daily basis, as well as supporting the potential for exposure to AMPs via inhalation. Uniquely, at the forefront of all publications, was the aim to provide novel, high quality methodologies, combatting methodological restrictions, and focusing considerably on improving the quality of research concerning AMPs and human exposure, with great emphasis on quality control. These chapters, alongside other AMP research, can form the foundations for future research improvements, leading to eventual standardised operating procedures (SOPs), policy formation, and to achieve guided, accurate and environmentally relevant MP exposure investigations.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Airborne Microplastics: Another Threatening to Our Health

This review examines the emerging evidence on airborne microplastics, covering their sources, how they travel through the atmosphere, and how they enter the human respiratory system through inhalation. Researchers highlight potential health effects including pulmonary inflammation, oxidative stress, and endocrine disruption, with particle size influencing how deeply they penetrate into the lungs. The study calls for standardized measurement protocols and urgent interdisciplinary research to better understand the health risks of breathing in microplastic particles.

Article Tier 2

An emerging class of air pollutants: Potential effects of microplastics to respiratory human health?

This review explores the emerging concern that airborne microplastics can be inhaled by humans, potentially causing adverse effects on the respiratory system. Researchers compiled available data on the concentration, size, shape, and chemical composition of microplastic particles found in urban air. The findings suggest that airborne plastic debris represents a largely understudied class of air pollutant with potential implications for human health.

Article Tier 2

Atmospheric Microplastics and Human Health: Sources, Exposure, and Risks

This review systematically summarizes the sources, distribution, and health implications of atmospheric microplastics in both indoor and outdoor air. The study highlights growing evidence that inhaled microplastics can enter the human body and pose potential risks to the respiratory system, while identifying key limitations and uncertainties in current exposure assessment methods.

Article Tier 2

The Current Status of Atmospheric Micro/Nanoplastics Research: Characterization, Analytical Methods, Fate, and Human Health Risk

This review synthesizes current knowledge on atmospheric micro- and nanoplastics, covering their characterization, analytical methods, environmental fate, and human health risks while highlighting the need for standardized sampling protocols to enable cross-study comparisons.

Article Tier 2

Atmospheric Microplastics: Perspectives on Origin, Abundances, Ecological and Health Risks

This review summarizes current knowledge about microplastics in the atmosphere, including their sources, how far they travel, and potential health effects from inhalation. Researchers found that airborne microplastics can carry toxic chemicals deep into the respiratory system and may contribute to respiratory problems and other health concerns. The study emphasizes that atmospheric microplastic pollution remains poorly understood due to a lack of standardized measurement methods.

Share this paper