We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Direct filtration of microfibre-containing wastewater using nanofibre membranes: combined effects of mode of filtration and type of microfibre
Summary
Scientists tested how tiny plastic fibers from clothes and textiles affect water treatment systems that remove these pollutants from wastewater. They found that different types of plastic fibers either help or hurt the cleaning process depending on the material and how the water flows through filters. This research is important because it could help improve systems that remove microplastics from our water supply before they reach rivers, oceans, and potentially our drinking water.
• PE microfibres mitigated fouling due to binding with soluble organics and cations. • PET and PA microfibres promoted the formation of a strong gel-like fouling matrix. • PET, PE and PA microfibres had a membrane shielding effect in dead-end filtration. • Fouling depends on microfibre type, membrane structure and flow conditions. Microfibre pollution derived from wastewater discharges containing synthetic fibres less than 5 mm in length poses significant environmental risks. Direct membrane filtration (DMF) offers an alternative solution for treating microfibre-containing wastewater, such as greywater and textile industry wastewater. In this study, the effects of microfibres on DMF performance, especially the interactions between microfibres and other potential foulants, were examined. Three microfibre types, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyamide (PA), and polyethylene (PE), were dosed at 10 mg/L to low-strength municipal wastewater, which was used as the feed water for DMF operated with polyacrylonitrile nanofibre membranes under either crossflow or dead-end filtration mode. The results revealed that the microfibres influenced membrane fouling mechanisms, with their behaviours associated with the microfibre material and the filtration mode. Under crossflow conditions, PET and PA microfibres increased the fouling resistance by 25-50% compared to the control, because they promoted the deposition of 8-39% more scalant cations, 17-23% more fulvic acid-like and 23-34% more humic acid-like matter on the membrane. Conversely, PE microfibres mitigated fouling by 45% due to their strong binding capacity with both soluble fluorescent organics and cations. Under dead-end filtration, the three microfibre types led to a reduction in membrane fouling by 23-46%, indicating that the perpendicular driving force allowed the deposited microfibres to interfere with the organics-cations gel-like matrix formation, resulting in less cake resistance. By elucidating the effects of microfibres in nanofibre membrane filtration, this study supports the development of resilient membrane processes for the treatment of microplastic-containing wastewater.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Analysis of membrane surface after the filtration of surface water containing microplastic
Researchers tested ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes on real river water containing microplastics and found both membrane types completely removed plastic particles from the filtered water, though the deposited microplastics reduced water flow through the membranes over time — confirming membrane filtration as an effective but imperfect water treatment strategy.
A novel methodology to study the release of fragmented fibres, including microplastics, in laboratory washing conditions
Scientists developed a new way to study how tiny plastic fibers break off from clothes during washing and end up polluting our water. This research method lets them watch exactly how fibers tear away from fabrics in real-time, which could help us understand and reduce microplastic pollution from laundry. Understanding this process is important because these microscopic plastic fibers can end up in our drinking water and food chain.
Microfibres from Textile Industry Effluents
Researchers reviewed the fate of microfibres released from textile industry effluents, finding that conventional wastewater treatment is insufficient to fully remove fibres, which then enter receiving waterways and contribute to environmental microplastic loads.
Microfibres versus fragments: differential impacts of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polyamide (PA6) microplastics on anaerobic digestion efficiency and microbial ecology
Scientists tested how tiny plastic particles affect the breakdown of waste in treatment plants that clean our water. They found that fiber-shaped microplastics (like from synthetic clothing) reduced the system's ability to process waste by up to 17%, while plastic fragments actually helped it work better. This matters because if our wastewater treatment plants become less efficient due to microplastic pollution, it could affect water quality and the environment around us.
Microplastics in different water samples (seawater, freshwater, and wastewater): Removal efficiency of membrane treatment processes
Researchers studied microplastic distribution across seawater, freshwater, and wastewater sources in France and evaluated the removal efficiency of membrane treatment processes. The study found that wastewater contained the highest concentrations of microplastics, and that membrane-based treatment technologies showed strong potential for removing microplastic particles from different water sources.