We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Understanding microplastic retention in surface flow constructed wetlands: The impact of aquatic macrophytes
AI summary Read the abstract
This study tested how well constructed wetlands with different aquatic plants retain three common types of microplastics: polyethylene beads, tire wear particles, and synthetic fibers. Plants with complex leaf structures trapped more microplastics than simpler plants or unvegetated areas. The findings suggest that planted wetlands could serve as a nature-based solution for filtering microplastics from water before they reach rivers and drinking water sources.
Microplastics are increasingly entering both natural and constructed wetlands, but their distribution, retention, and interactions with aquatic macrophytes remain poorly understood. This study investigated the fate and retention of three common types of microplastics — polyethylene microbeads, tire wear particles, and polyacrylonitrile fibers — each introduced at a concentration of 547 particles/L into a laboratory surface flow constructed wetland. The experimental setup included unvegetated and vegetated experiments with four submerged macrophytes of different leaf morphology and a floating macrophyte to evaluate the role of vegetation in microplastic retention and their impact on plant health over 12 days. The results showed that the majority of microplastics are associated with the air-water or sediment-water interfaces after entering the wetland. Fibers and tire wear particles were mainly found in the sediment, regardless of the presence of vegetation. Of the microbeads, 25 % settled in the unvegetated wetland, while 56 % were found in the sediment of the vegetated constructed wetland, suggesting that vegetation promotes the settling of buoyant microplastics. Overall, the constructed wetland exhibited high retention efficiency for all microplastic types, with over 99.9 %, regardless of the vegetation present. Microplastics were observed to attach to macrophytes, and plant morphology was a key factor influencing retention. No significant effects on the electron transport system and only minor, non-particle-specific effects on chlorophyll a content were observed. These results highlighted the effectiveness of constructed wetlands in retaining microplastics and the need for further research on the interactions between plants and microplastics to optimize wetland design for microplastics management. • Surface flow constructed wetlands retained over 99.9 % of microplastics. • Vegetation increased retention of buoyant polyethylene microbeads. • Fibers and tire wear particles predominantly settled in the sediment across all setups. • Leaf morphology influenced retention efficiency of plants. • Presence of microplastics had minor negative effects on plants.
More Papers Like This
Distribution and fate of microplastics in a laboratory surface-flow constructed wetland
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tracked how different types of microplastics (polyethylene microbeads, rubber fragments, and plastic fibers) were distributed and retained in a laboratory-scale constructed wetland planted with aquatic macrophytes. The plants and substrate effectively trapped microplastics, suggesting constructed wetlands can provide additional removal of plastic particles beyond conventional wastewater treatment.
Effects of macrophytes on micro – And nanoplastic retention and cycling in constructed wetlands
AI summary Read the abstract
This study tested how the presence of aquatic plants (macrophytes) in constructed wetlands affects the capture and cycling of micro- and nanoplastics. Researchers found that planted wetlands were significantly better at intercepting nanoplastics and also improved nitrogen and phosphorus removal even when exposed to plastic particles. The findings suggest that including macrophytes in constructed wetland designs can enhance their ability to manage plastic pollution in water.
Retention of microplastics by interspersed lagoons in both natural and constructed wetlands
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used laboratory wetland models to test how well constructed wetlands with interspersed lagoons and aquatic vegetation can capture microplastic particles from water. Combining vegetated patches with a lagoon achieved microplastic retention rates of up to 99%, suggesting that nature-based wetland designs could be an effective low-cost strategy for filtering microplastics out of wastewater and rivers before they reach the ocean.
Microplastics profile in constructed wetlands: Distribution, retention and implications
AI summary Read the abstract
This study assessed microplastic distribution, retention, and implications within constructed wetlands used for wastewater treatment, finding that wetlands trap substantial quantities of MPs but that retention efficiency varies by plant species and wetland design. The results suggest constructed wetlands both remove and potentially accumulate MPs as a secondary pollution source.
Fate and removal of microplastics in unplanted lab-scale vertical flow constructed wetlands
AI summary Read the abstract
Laboratory-scale unplanted vertical flow constructed wetlands were shown to remove microplastics from wastewater, with removal efficiency influenced by particle size, shape, and flow rate, highlighting constructed wetlands as a nature-based option for microplastic mitigation.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.