We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Micro-and nanoplastics in biological samples following a drinking water intervention in Barcelona, Spain
AI summary Read the abstract
This clinical trial studied whether switching between bottled water and tap water changes the levels of micro- and nanoplastics found in people's bodies. In a small crossover study in Barcelona, researchers measured plastic particles in participants' biological samples after periods of drinking different water types. The findings provide early evidence that our choice of drinking water source may directly affect how much plastic we carry in our bodies.
Micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) are emerging contaminants of concern, and drinking water may represent an important exposure pathway. Evidence on internal exposure and contribution of drinking water remains limited. Under the hypothesis that bottled water consumption may lead to higher body burden of MNPs compared to tap water, this exploratory study investigated changes in MNPs and plastic-related additives in human biological samples following sequential changes in drinking water consumption. A randomized crossover intervention was conducted in volunteers (N = 3) sequentially switching between tap and bottled water consumption in randomized phases during 7 weeks (May-July 2022) in Barcelona, Spain. Stool (N = 48), urine (N = 48), tap water (N = 24), and bottled water (N = 2) samples were collected. MNP polymers 0.7-20 µm and chemicals used as additives in plastic production were quantified in biological samples through double suspect screening using high-performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry. Microplastics >1 µm in water were analyzed by pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. MNP polymers were detected in N = 40 (83%) stool samples and were above quantification limits (QL) in N = 30 (63%). Polyethylene was > QL in N = 20 (42%), polyamide in N = 8 (17%), polypropylene in N = 8 (17%), and polyoxymethylene in N = 2 (4%) samples. Detection rates were lower in urine samples. Plastic-related additives were identified in all urine samples, N = 27 different additives, with N = 15 > QL (median concentration range: 0.03-2196 µg/L). Microplastic polymers including polypropylene, polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate, and polyvinyl chloride were found in 62% of tap water samples (median total concentration: 0.18 µg/L), and polyethylene was detected in bottled water. Within the scope of this exploratory study, no significant differences between phases were found in MNP polymers and plastic additives concentrations in biological samples. Low detection rates of MNP polymers in stool and urine limited the statistical power. Larger, controlled studies are needed to further evaluate the contribution of drinking water on human MNP exposure.
More Papers Like This
Occurrence of Microplastics in Tap and Bottled Water: Current Knowledge
AI summary Read the abstract
This review summarizes current research on microplastic contamination in both tap and bottled drinking water. Researchers found that microplastics are present in both water sources, with bottled water generally containing higher concentrations than tap water, and smaller particles being more abundant. The study raises public health concerns and emphasizes the need for improved detection methods and drinking water treatment standards.
Microplastics and nanoplastics contamination in raw and treated water
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers analyzed 189 samples of raw, tap, and bottled drinking water for micro- and nanoplastic contamination. They found plastic particles in every sample tested, with raw water sources containing the highest concentrations and treated tap water containing the lowest, though contamination was never fully eliminated. The study suggests that current water treatment processes reduce but do not completely remove plastic particles from drinking water.
Synthetic Microplastics in UK tap and bottled water; Implications for human exposure
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested 177 tap water samples from 13 UK cities and 85 bottled water samples from 17 brands, finding microplastics in every single sample with no meaningful difference in average concentration between tap and bottled water. Infants and toddlers were estimated to ingest four times more microplastics per kilogram of body weight than adults, raising concerns given their still-developing immune and nervous systems.
Analytical Review of Microplastics Occurrence in Bottled Water, Tap Water, and Wastewater Treatment Plants
AI summary Read the abstract
This review analyzes microplastic contamination across bottled water, tap water, and wastewater treatment plants using data from studies worldwide. Researchers found that microplastic levels in drinking water are closely tied to the water source and that packaging type significantly influences contamination, with glass bottles recommended over plastic. The study emphasizes the need for improved water treatment technologies and greater public awareness about microplastic exposure through drinking water.
Microplastics and non-natural cellulosic particles in Spanish bottled drinking water
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers analyzed five top-selling bottled water brands in Spain and found microplastics in all of them, primarily polyester and polyethylene particles likely originating from the PET bottles and caps. While the estimated daily intake from bottled water alone was relatively low, the study adds to evidence that bottled water is a consistent source of microplastic exposure for consumers.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.