0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Responses of cotton growth, physiology, and soil properties to polyethylene microplastics in arid areas

Environmental Geochemistry and Health 2025 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 43 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Chengcheng Wu, Wenhao Su, Zailei Yang, Deqiang Li, Lianhong Gu, Xinyue Chen, Yang Hu, Yang Hu, Xinping Zhu, Xiangnan Li, Hongtao Jia, Xingwang Ma

Summary

A field study in the arid Xinjiang region of China investigated how polyethylene microplastics from plastic mulch films affect cotton plant growth, soil chemistry, and microbial communities. At higher concentrations, microplastics reduced cotton germination rates, altered root structure, and changed the soil's microbial makeup and enzyme activity, suggesting negative effects on soil health and crop productivity. Given that plastic film mulching is widespread in Chinese agriculture — and generates enormous quantities of residual microplastics — these findings raise concerns about long-term soil degradation in farming regions.

Polymers

Microplastics (MPs), as a global environmental issue, have unclear impacts on agricultural ecosystems. Cotton, as a major agricultural crop in Xinjiang, requires plastic film covering to ensure its yield. The widespread use of plastic film (commonly made of polyethylene) in cotton cultivation has led to significant concerns about microplastic pollution in cotton fields. However, there is limited research on the effects of MPs on cotton growth and cotton field ecosystems. This study investigates the effects of different concentrations and particle sizes of polyethylene microplastics (PE-MPs) on the physiological changes in cotton plants and the physicochemical properties of the soil. The results show that cotton seedling growth was inhibited in all treatment groups, with a clear dose-dependent effect. In the 200 μmwt% treatment group, the cotton seedlings' antioxidant system experienced severe stress, reflected by significant increases in malondialdehyde and total soluble proteins by 58.95% and 94.29%, respectively, which suppressed plant growth and caused a significant reduction in cotton plant height by 41.95%. Additionally, the inhibition of leaf photosynthesis by PE-MPs was more pronounced as the particle size decreased. Under higher concentrations (1wt%, 3wt%), the transpiration rate (Tr) and stomatal conductance (Gs) were significantly suppressed. In the 2 μmwt% treatment group, Gs and Tr decreased significantly by 44.35% and 36.21%, respectively, compared to the control group. Furthermore, the addition of PE-MPs significantly increased the organic matter and available nitrogen content in the soil, with a dose-dependent effect. At the highest concentration (3wt%), the available nitrogen content increased by 1.78, 1.86, and 1.68 times, respectively, compared to the control group. These findings demonstrate the impact of PE-MPs on cotton seedlings and soil properties, providing strong evidence for the ecological risks of MPs in plastic film-covered agricultural fields.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastic contamination in cotton soils following long-term mulching: A field study for the Xinjiang production and construction corps in China

Researchers investigated microplastic accumulation across agricultural soils in Xinjiang, China — a major mulch film use region — finding that microplastic abundance positively correlates with mulching duration and that geographical and social factors drive north-south differences in contamination levels.

Article Tier 2

Cropland Microplastics in Xinjiang: Unveiling Distribution and Impact of Mulching Film Residues

This study assessed microplastic distribution and the contribution of agricultural mulching film residues across croplands in Xinjiang, China, finding widespread polyethylene microplastic contamination that correlates with mulch film use intensity and poses risks to soil health and food safety.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in arid soils: Impact of different cropping systems (Altay, Xinjiang)

Researchers investigated microplastic contamination in farmland soils in an arid region of China, finding extremely high concentrations averaging over 52,000 particles per kilogram of soil. Polyethylene from plastic mulch film accounted for over 90% of the microplastics, with fields growing tall crops like sunflower and maize showing more contamination than potato fields. The study demonstrates that agricultural plastic mulch use is a major source of soil microplastic pollution, particularly in arid farming regions.

Article Tier 2

The persistently breaking trade-offs of three-decade plastic film mulching: Microplastic pollution, soil degradation and reduced cotton yield

A study of cotton fields in northwest China with 3-32 years of continuous plastic mulch use found that microplastic abundance in soil increased exponentially with mulching duration, while soil physical properties degraded and cotton root traits and yields declined in heavily mulched plots. The results challenge the assumed economic trade-off of plastic mulching, suggesting decades of cumulative MP pollution eventually costs more in yield than it provides in early-season benefits.

Article Tier 2

The effects of biodegradable mulch film on the growth, yield, and water use efficiency of cotton and maize in an arid region

Researchers compared biodegradable and conventional plastic mulch films in Chinese agriculture, finding that biodegradable films improved water use efficiency and crop yield comparably to conventional plastic while reducing long-term plastic accumulation in soil. Degradable mulch films represent a promising strategy to reduce agricultural microplastic pollution.

Share this paper