0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Impacts of Pandemic‐Associated Plastic Waste on Microplastics in Ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub>

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres 2025 Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Kai Wang Kai Wang Fobang Liu, Qing Huang, Kai Wang Kai Wang Kai Wang Kai Wang Kai Wang Mengting Guo, Mengting Guo, Yanan Wang, Kai Wang Shuqi Yang, Shuqi Yang, Fobang Liu, Kai Wang Yang Xu, Qing Huang, Kai Wang Kai Wang Kai Wang Chi He, Junxian Hou, Guibin Wang, Chi He, Kai Wang Kai Wang Qing Huang, Kai Wang Kai Wang

Summary

Researchers measured microplastics in atmospheric PM2.5 samples collected from urban Xi'an before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. They found that MP concentrations tripled during and after the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic levels, with transparent and white polypropylene and PET fibers dominant—consistent with increased single-use plastic disposal.

Body Systems
Models

Abstract Microplastics (MPs) are a rising environmental and health concern, and the COVID‐19 pandemic has increased plastic waste, particularly single‐use plastics. While the impacts of pandemic‐associated plastic waste on multiple environmental matrices (e.g., water and soil) have been well documented, its effects on MPs in atmospheric fine particles (PM 2.5 ) remain unclear. In this study, we analyzed the MPs in ambient PM 2.5 collected from urban Xi'an before, during, and after the COVID‐19 pandemic in both summer and winter. Mean MP concentrations during and after the pandemic were three times higher than prepandemic levels, irrespective of the season. Transparent and white polypropylene and polyethylene terephthalate fibers dominated during and after the pandemic, while prepandemic MPs were more diverse in polymer types and colors. These results indicate a strong impact of pandemic‐associated waste, especially discarded face masks, on the abundance and characteristics of MPs in ambient PM 2.5 . Additionally, a positive correlation was found between MPs and ambient ozone, suggesting the potential for ozone to degrade plastics and release MPs into the air. Multiple‐path particle dosimetry calculations revealed that MPs primarily deposit in the extrathoracic region of people across all age groups. However, teenagers and younger individuals showed increased susceptibility to deposition in tracheobronchial and pulmonary regions. Based on the estimated daily dose, inhalation of MPs from ambient PM 2.5 is proposed to be a significant exposure pathway for humans. Overall, our study highlights the substantial impacts of pandemic‐associated plastic waste on MPs in ambient PM 2.5 and their potential implications for human exposure.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper