We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Atmospheric deposition of anthropogenic microfibers in different indoor environments of Chennai, India
Summary
Researchers measured atmospheric deposition of anthropogenic microfibers—including both synthetic and natural fiber types—in indoor residential and institutional environments in Chennai, India. Indoor deposition rates were high and dominated by cotton and synthetic fiber types, with occupant behavior and air circulation patterns driving variability, indicating that indoor air is a significant but underestimated exposure route.
Microplastics, particularly microplastic fibers, are an emerging pollutant of growing concern, frequently detected in the atmosphere. However, recent studies emphasized the predominance of artificial and natural microfibers over microplastic fibers. Despite this, research focusing on all types of microfibers, commonly grouped as anthropogenic microfibers (MFs) remains limited, especially in residential indoor environments. Therefore, this study explored the indoor atmospheric deposition of microfibers, in the residential homes of Chennai, India, marking the first such study in the country. Additionally, workplaces, including offices, laboratories, and hostel rooms, were examined. Bedrooms (16,736±7,263 MFs/m²/day) and student hostels (5,572±2,898 MFs/m²/day) recorded the highest contamination in respective categories, and this could be attributed to the abundance of textile products, such as bedsheets, carpets, quilts, towels, and curtains in the indoors of both the rooms. MFs shorter than 500 µm dominated the samples, comprising 78.8 and 65.9 % of total MFs in residential and workplace categories, respectively. The diameter of MFs ranged from 2.02–23 µm in residential spaces and 2.04–36.4 µm in workplaces, indicating their potential to penetrate human lungs. µ-FTIR analysis revealed the predominance of semi-synthetic MFs (48.2 %), followed by natural (29.3%) and synthetic (22.5 %) MFs, underscoring the need to consider all categories of MFs. Further classification revealed rayon (94.5±6.40 %), cotton (68.1±6.12 %), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) (48.1±11.5 %) as major MFs, indicating textiles as a significant contamination source. The detection of black rubber/latex MFs indicates additional contributions from road dust. Surface morphological analysis, correlations with environmental and meteorological factors, and backward trajectory analysis further highlighted the primary role of indoor/local sources in MFs contamination. Overall, the study emphasizes the need to monitor all categories of MFs and calls for comprehensive investigations into the impact of indoor textile products and road dust on indoor atmospheric contamination in future research.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Airborne microplastics distribution in indoor and outdoor environments of a rapidly growing city in South India
Researchers measured airborne microplastic concentrations bound to particulate matter in both indoor and outdoor environments across Tiruchirappalli, a rapidly growing city in Tamil Nadu, India. Indoor concentrations exceeded outdoor levels at several sites, with synthetic fiber microplastics dominating, indicating that indoor human activities contribute significantly to inhalation exposure.
Atmospheric microplastic fallout in outdoor and indoor environments in São Paulo megacity
Researchers measured microplastic fallout in both outdoor and indoor environments across the megacity of Sao Paulo, Brazil, and found that indoor environments had significantly higher microplastic deposition rates than outdoor locations. Fibers from synthetic textiles were the most common type of airborne microplastic detected. The study highlights that people living in densely populated cities may face substantial microplastic exposure simply from the air they breathe indoors.
A first overview of textile fibers, including microplastics, in indoor and outdoor environments
This study is the first to investigate synthetic fiber contamination in both indoor and outdoor air, finding that indoor environments contained significantly higher concentrations of fibers than outdoor settings. Researchers identified that most airborne fibers were synthetic materials like polypropylene and polyethylene, with indoor levels ranging from 1 to 60 fibers per cubic meter. The findings suggest that people may be inhaling substantial amounts of microplastic fibers simply by spending time indoors.
Microplastics comparison of indoor and outdoor air and ventilation rate effect in outskirts of the Seoul metropolitan city
Researchers measured airborne microplastics both indoors and outdoors in buildings near Seoul, finding that indoor concentrations were 1.8 times higher than outdoor levels. Polyester fibers from clothing and furnishings were the most common type, and lower ventilation rates led to higher indoor microplastic levels, meaning the air people breathe at home and work may be a significant source of microplastic exposure.
Indoor microplastics: a comprehensive review and bibliometric analysis
This review summarizes research on microplastic pollution inside buildings, where people spend most of their time. Indoor environments generally have higher microplastic concentrations than outdoors, with fiber-shaped particles from synthetic textiles being the most common type. Since people inhale and ingest these particles daily, indoor microplastic exposure may be a significant and underappreciated route of human health risk.