0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

The Combined Effects of Cadmium and Microplastic Mixtures on the Digestion, Energy Metabolism, Oxidative Stress Regulation, Immune Function, and Metabolomes in the Pearl Oyster (Pinctada fucata martensii)

Fishes 2025 3 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Jiaying Yao, Zhiliang Gao, Zhixiang Wang, Z. W. Ge, Yujing Lin, Yujing Lin, Lisha Huang, J. B. Liu, Huayao Zou, Chuangye Yang, Robert Mkuye, Robert Mkuye, Yuewen Deng

Summary

Researchers studied the combined effects of cadmium and microplastics on pearl oysters, measuring impacts on digestion, energy use, immune function, and metabolism. They found that co-exposure to both pollutants caused more severe damage than either alone, disrupting the oysters' antioxidant defenses and metabolic processes. The study highlights the compounding threat that metal and microplastic pollution together pose to marine shellfish.

The accumulation of cadmium (Cd) and microplastics (MPs) can have major deleterious effects on the health of marine ecosystems and organisms, including the pearl oyster Pinctada fucata martensii. Here, we characterized the effects of Cd and MPs on key biochemical parameters of P. f. martensii via an experiment with various treatments. Pearl oysters were exposed to either only Cd (5 or 50 μg/L), only MPs (5 mg/L), or both Cd and MPs for 2 d, and this was followed by a 5-day recovery period. Measurements of the activities of lipase, amylase, protease, T-ATPase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, acid phosphatase, and alkaline phosphatase enzymes, as well as the malondialdehyde content in the hepatopancreas, were made at various time points during the experiment. Metabolomics analysis of the gills was also performed. Significant interactions between time and treatment on lipase, protease, and catalase activities were observed. However, no significant effect of time–treatment interactions on amylase and T-ATPase activities was observed. Enzyme activities varied among groups both during the exposure period (6 to 48 h) and the recovery period. The malondialdehyde content was also increased throughout the experiment. Pathway analysis indicated that the purine metabolism, glycerophospholipid metabolism, nucleotide metabolism, arachidonic acid metabolism, neuroactive ligand–receptor interaction, and linoleic acid metabolism pathways were the most commonly affected under different treatments. The findings of our study revealed the differential effects of exposure time and treatment on enzyme activities and metabolites and their respective pathways. Our findings enhance our understanding of the biochemical responses of the pearl oyster P. f. martensii to environmental stressors, particularly Cd and MPs.

Share this paper