0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Examination of the Efficacy of International Law in Combatting Trans-Border Environmental Crimes

NIU journal of legal studies. 2025 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 43 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Godswill Owoche Antai, Paul Atagamen Aidonojie, Jacob Eneji Ashibi, Collins Ekpenisi, Muwaffiq Jufri, Obieshi Eregbounye

Summary

Despite its title referencing trans-border environmental crimes, this paper is a legal analysis examining how international law handles crimes like illegal logging, wildlife trafficking, and transboundary pollution — not microplastic pollution. It reviews international treaties and enforcement mechanisms for these broader environmental crimes, and is not directly relevant to microplastics or human health.

This Research explores how international law regulates trans-border environmental crimes such as illegal logging, wildlife trafficking, and transboundary pollution. Those crimes pose an exceptional challenge to the usually state-based legal regime at a time of globalization, which further complicated governance over the environment. This research assessed the suitability of international law in addressing trans-border environmental crimes. The doctrinal method is employed in this research through a review of international treaties, conventions, and enforcement mechanisms in order to assess their effectiveness in controlling these illicit activities. Case studies from different regions in the research point out the deficiencies in the current legal structure, besides corruption, weak governance, and lack of capacity to enforce them in source countries. The research suggests improvements in international cooperation, capacity building, and enforcement. The findings could help construct more efficient legal responses for the protection of global ecosystems from trans-border environmental crimes.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Legal Analysis of the Prevention of Marine Microplastics Pollution

This legal analysis examines international law frameworks governing marine microplastic pollution prevention, identifying obstacles including enforcement difficulties, weak jurisdictional clarity, and insufficient coordination among existing treaty regimes, while noting growing attention to microplastics in UN General Assembly resolutions and calling for stronger multilateral legal mechanisms.

Article Tier 2

International Law and Regulation of Marine Microplastics: Current Situation, Problems, and Development

This study evaluated the current international legal framework governing marine microplastic pollution and identified significant gaps in regulatory coverage. Researchers found that existing global and regional legal instruments lack the specificity and enforcement mechanisms needed to effectively address microplastic contamination. The study offers recommendations for strengthening international law to better regulate the sources and impacts of marine microplastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

Freshwater Pollution by Plastics – Transboundary Pollution and Liability

This legal analysis examined the environmental and health risks of plastic and microplastic pollution in freshwater systems, reviewing the existing international and national legal frameworks for addressing transboundary pollution. The authors identified significant gaps in liability and enforcement mechanisms for freshwater microplastic contamination.

Article Tier 2

Enhancing Marine Environmental Protection Enforcement in Taiwan: Legal and Policy Reforms in the Context of International Conventions

Despite its title referencing marine environmental protection, this paper studies Taiwan's legal and institutional framework for maritime pollution control — specifically how its laws compare to international conventions like MARPOL and UNCLOS — not microplastic pollution. It examines ship emission control, oil spill liability, and interagency coordination gaps and is not relevant to microplastics or human health.

Article Tier 2

International Environmental Law and Marine Pollution in the Pacific Islands: Promoting Sustainable Ocean Governance

Not relevant to microplastics — this international law paper reviews strategies for sustainable ocean governance in Pacific Island nations, covering fisheries management, waste policy, and regional cooperation, but does not focus specifically on microplastic contamination.

Share this paper