0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Food & Water Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Natural and Regenerated Cellulosic Microfibers Dominate Anthropogenic Particles Ingested by Commercial Fish Species from the Adriatic Sea

Foods 2025 4 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 58 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Serena Santonicola, Michela Volgare, Serena Santonicola, Michela Volgare, Federico Olivieri, Mariacristina Cocca Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Serena Santonicola, Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Serena Santonicola, Michela Volgare, Serena Santonicola, Michela Volgare, Serena Santonicola, Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Mariacristina Cocca Michela Volgare, Serena Santonicola, Serena Santonicola, Serena Santonicola, Serena Santonicola, Serena Santonicola, Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Serena Santonicola, Serena Santonicola, Serena Santonicola, Serena Santonicola, Serena Santonicola, Mariacristina Cocca Serena Santonicola, Serena Santonicola, Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Michela Volgare, Federico Olivieri, Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Serena Santonicola, Giampaolo Colavita, Giampaolo Colavita, Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Giampaolo Colavita, Giampaolo Colavita, Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Giampaolo Colavita, Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Giampaolo Colavita, Mariacristina Cocca Giampaolo Colavita, Giampaolo Colavita, Mariacristina Cocca Giampaolo Colavita, Mariacristina Cocca Giampaolo Colavita, Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Giampaolo Colavita, Giampaolo Colavita, Mariacristina Cocca Serena Santonicola, Giampaolo Colavita, Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Giampaolo Colavita, Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Giampaolo Colavita, Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Giampaolo Colavita, Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Giampaolo Colavita, Giampaolo Colavita, Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Giampaolo Colavita, Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca Mariacristina Cocca

Summary

Researchers examined what commercial fish species from the Adriatic Sea are actually swallowing and found that natural and regenerated cellulose microfibers, rather than synthetic plastics, dominated the particles in their digestive tracts. While synthetic microplastics like polyester and nylon were present, they made up only a fraction of the total fibers ingested. The study highlights the importance of distinguishing between synthetic microplastics and natural textile fibers when assessing marine pollution.

Body Systems

This study investigated the occurrence of fibrous microplastics and natural and artificial cellulose microfibers in the gastrointestinal tracts of <i>Mullus barbatus</i> and <i>Merluccius merluccius</i> specimens from the Adriatic Sea (Central Mediterranean), an important hotspot for marine litter accumulation. Red mullet and European hake were chosen due to their roles as bioindicators of marine pollution in the Mediterranean, and their economic relevance as fishery resources. Microfibers were found in 72% of <i>M. barbatus</i> and 68% of <i>M. merluccius</i>, at levels ranging from 1 to 67 particles/individual. Most of the microfibers extracted were textile fibers that were blue (33.6%), clear (26.1%), and black (20.3%) in color, while the length distribution showed the prevalence of microfibers in the size range of 350-950 µm. This visual identification, corroborated by the micro-FTIR analysis of a sub-sample of microfibers, revealed that natural and artificial cellulose microfibers were more common (80%) than fibrous microplastics. The results confirmed that both of these fish species are susceptible to microfiber ingestion and indicated the high availability of natural and artificial cellulosic fibers in the Adriatic Basin. Despite the increased evidence of microfiber pollution in the marine ecosystem, only a limited number of studies examine natural/artificial microfiber contamination and ingestion by marine biota. Therefore, greater attention should be given to this new type of contaminant, considering its implications in terms of environmental health, food security, and food safety.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper