0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Food & Water Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Remediation Sign in to save

Quantifying Nanoplastics and Microplastics in Food and Beverages Using Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry: Challenges and Implications

ACS Food Science & Technology 2025 10 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 68 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Coral Jeffries, Cassandra Rauert, Kevin V. Thomas

Summary

Scientists used a specialized analytical technique to measure nanoplastics and microplastics in common Australian foods and beverages, estimating that people consume about 1.7 to 2.0 milligrams of plastic per year from drinks like water, tea, coffee, beer, and wine alone. The study also highlighted that current detection methods may undercount plastic contamination in solid foods because of measurement limitations.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

The widespread use of plastics has led to contamination of all environmental compartments, including food, by nanoplastics (NP) and microplastics (MP). However, the full extent of dietary exposure remains unclear due to analytical limitations and insufficient data on commonly consumed foods. This study aims to provide new insight into this area by assessing the effectiveness of pyrolysis-gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (Pyr-GC–MS) in measuring NP and MP contamination in food and beverages and conducting the first Australian food basket survey to estimate dietary exposure for the Australian population. The study evaluated challenges and uncertainties in analyzing food matrices by Pyr-GC–MS, such as background contamination, high method detection limits, and matrix interferences. The concentrations of plastics in the food matrices analyzed were low, and accelerated solvent extraction, prior to Pyr-GC–MS analysis, did not achieve the sensitivity required for quantification. Conversely, beverage filtration provided improved sensitivity. NP and MP exposure from drinking water, tea, coffee, beer, and wine was estimated at 1.7–2.0 mg/person/year, with polypropylene being the major contributor.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

QuantifyingNanoplastics and Microplastics in Foodand Beverages Using Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry:Challenges and Implications

Researchers evaluated pyrolysis-GC/MS for quantifying nanoplastics and microplastics in common foods and beverages, assessing sensitivity and detection limits across polymer types. The method successfully detected multiple polymer types in food samples but showed limitations for nanoplastics at very low concentrations, highlighting gaps in current dietary exposure assessment.

Article Tier 2

Micro- and nanoplastics: Contamination routes of food products and critical interpretation of detection strategies

This review evaluates current methods for detecting micro and nanoplastics in food and beverages, from sample preparation to chemical identification. The authors highlight significant challenges including detection sensitivity limits, interference from food matrices, and a lack of standardized protocols. Better analytical tools are needed to accurately assess how much microplastic contamination people are actually consuming.

Article Tier 2

Determination of microparticles, in particular microplastics in beverages

This study reviewed and tested methods for detecting microparticles including microplastics in beverages, addressing a gap in food safety monitoring. The research is relevant to understanding human exposure to microplastics through drinking water and packaged beverages.

Article Tier 2

Quantitative analysis of nanoplastics in environmental and potable waters by pyrolysis-gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

Scientists developed and validated a new method to detect and measure nine types of nanoplastics in drinking and environmental water at very low concentrations. They found nanoplastics in every water sample tested, with polyethylene, PET, polypropylene, and polystyrene being the most common at levels up to 1.17 micrograms per liter. This is one of the first studies to quantify nanoplastics in drinking water, confirming that people are regularly exposed through their tap water.

Article Tier 2

Identification, Quantification, and Presence of Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Beverages Around the World

Researchers reviewed studies from around the world examining microplastics in beverages including water, beer, soft drinks, and other drinks. They found microplastics were present in virtually all beverage types tested, with concentrations ranging widely and particles originating from water sources, packaging materials, and processing surfaces. The findings raise concerns about ongoing low-level human exposure through everyday drinks.

Share this paper