We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Micro- and nanoplastics differ in particle-mucus interactions: The sight on rheological properties, barrier dysfunction and microbiota dysbiosis
Summary
Researchers compared how micro- and nanoplastics interact with the protective mucus layer lining the intestines and found that nanoplastics were wrapped in mucus while microplastics were not. Both particle sizes disrupted the gut barrier and altered the gut microbiome in mice at environmentally relevant doses, but through different mechanisms. The study suggests that the mucus layer, a key line of defense in the gut, responds differently depending on plastic particle size, with implications for understanding how ingested plastics may affect digestive health.
Micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) in food can cross the intestinal barrier and accumulate in multiple organs. Mucus serves as a vital defense against such invaders, but the nature of its interaction with MNPs remains unclear. In this study, we investigated changes in the rheological properties of mucus and the physicochemical properties of MNPs in co-incubation. The effects of MNPs on the mucus layer and gut microbiota were also assessed in vivo at environmentally relevant doses. MNPs adsorbed proteins in mucus, increasing apparent particle size, and reducing the surface charges. They broke the selective permeability of barrier and destroyed the histomorphology and microenvironment of microbiota in mice. Notably, nanoplastics were wrapped in mucus. They induced mucus secretion, crosstalk of microbiota, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) burst. Microplastics reduced the composite viscosity of mucus and thinned the mucus layer, facilitating diversification of harmful bacteria. Size plays a crucial role in particle-mucus interactions: nanoplastics tend to penetrate the mucus layer and disrupt microbial colonization, while microplastics contribute to mucus depletion. The physicochemical properties of MNPs and mucus characteristics affect microbial community, modulating the MNPs biotoxicity. These findings provide insights into mucus barrier homeostasis in health risk of MNPs.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Perturbation of gut microbiota plays an important role in micro/nanoplastics-induced gut barrier dysfunction
Researchers investigated how micro- and nanoplastics disrupt gut barrier function in mice, finding that different surface chemistries caused varying levels of damage. The study suggests that these plastic particles harm the gut by altering the gut microbiome, which then leads to inflammation and weakening of the intestinal barrier that normally keeps harmful substances out of the body.
The role of human intestinal mucus in the prevention of microplastic uptake and cell damage
Researchers studied how the mucus lining of the human intestine acts as a barrier against microplastic particles of different sizes and surface coatings. The mucus layer significantly reduced microplastic uptake by cells and protected against toxicity and inflammation. This study suggests that a healthy intestinal mucus layer is an important natural defense against the harmful effects of swallowed microplastics.
The role of gut microbiota in mediating increased toxicity of nano-sized polystyrene compared to micro-sized polystyrene in mice
This mouse study found that nano-sized polystyrene plastics were significantly more toxic than micro-sized ones, causing greater gut inflammation, liver damage, and metabolic disruption. The key difference was driven by how each size affected gut bacteria: nanoplastics caused a more severe shift toward harmful bacteria and away from beneficial ones. The findings suggest that the smallest plastic particles may pose the greatest health risk because they more dramatically disrupt the gut microbiome.
Impacts of polystyrene microplastic on the gut barrier, microbiota and metabolism of mice
Researchers exposed mice to polystyrene microplastics for six weeks and found that the particles accumulated in the gut, reduced protective mucus secretion, and damaged the intestinal barrier. The microplastics also significantly altered the composition of gut bacteria, decreasing beneficial species and increasing harmful ones. The study suggests that microplastic ingestion could disrupt gut health in mammals by simultaneously impairing the physical barrier and reshaping the microbiome.
Continuous oral exposure to micro- and nanoplastics induced gut microbiota dysbiosis, intestinal barrier and immune dysfunction in adult mice
Researchers fed mice micro- and nanoplastics at environmentally relevant levels and found significant gut damage, including disrupted gut bacteria, weakened intestinal barriers, and reduced immune function. The ratio of beneficial to harmful gut bacteria shifted, and immune cells in the gut decreased. Importantly, the duration of exposure and the size of plastic particles mattered more than the amount consumed, suggesting even low-level long-term exposure could harm gut health.