0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Food & Water Human Health Effects Remediation Sign in to save

Influence of Different Coagulants on Microplastics Removal

The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University) 2025 Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Wang, Mia

Summary

Researchers compared the effectiveness of different coagulants—including aluminum sulfate, ferric chloride, and polyaluminum chloride—for removing microplastics from water, finding significant performance differences dependent on plastic particle size, charge, and coagulant dose.

Study Type Environmental

Microplastics (MPs) have become a topic of concern for human health over the past several years and drinking water has been identified as an important pathway for MP exposure. Coagulation processes in conventional drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) have been found to significantly reduce MPs in treated water. Most research to date on the effects of coagulation and MP removal has been conducted using pristine plastic particles or lab-aged model particles. These pristine and model plastics lack many important surface characteristics of the environmental MPs found in the raw water treated by DWTPs. In this project, I analyzed the effectiveness of different coagulants, doses, and coagulant aids to remove environmental MPs under typical conditions used in DWTPs. This project utilized raw water from the Olentangy River to analyze MP concentration and removal via coagulation. Three different chemical coagulants commonly used in DWTPs (ferric chloride, aluminum sulfate, and aluminum chlorohydrate) were compared for MP removal using jar testing methods. Microplastics were isolated from the raw and treated water and imaged using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to quantify MP content and determine removal efficiencies. The samples were also analyzed using optical photothermal infrared (OPTIR) spectroscopy to characterize polymer types present in raw and treated water samples. The results showed the dose of aluminum sulfate (alum), ferric chloride (FeCl3), and aluminum chlorohydrate (ACH) that provides optimal removal of MPs was 30 mg/L. Across all doses, coagulation provides significant removal of MPs of 69.1-93.7% as particles/L and 57.6-95.7% as µg/L), with observed removal for the tests conducted with ACH being the largest (86.9-93.7%). Turbidity was used to assess its relationship to MP removal. Alum had the largest reduction in turbidity compared to FeCl3 and ACH (79.5-92.9% across all three coagulants). This shows that turbidity is not necessarily an indicator of MP removal in drinking water, while it is an important water quality parameter in drinking water treatment. Removal efficiencies achieved in this study demonstrated greater MP removal during coagulation when compared to some studies that used model plastics. However, some studies using extensive aging methods for model plastics showed removal efficiencies consistent with the results of this test. Overall, this research demonstrated that lab-aged MPs can act as a model for environmental MPs when sufficiently weathered with treatments that mimic natural weathering processes.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Investigating the Potential of Coagulants to Improve Microplastics Removal in Wastewater and Tap Water

Researchers found that adding coagulants (FeCl3 or Al2(SO4)3) to wastewater and tap water improved microplastic removal, with aluminum sulfate achieving 43% and 62% removal efficiencies respectively, though the high concentrations required suggest that combining coagulants with organic polyelectrolytes could improve practicality.

Article Tier 2

The influence of coagulation process conditions on theefficiency of microplastic removal in water treatment

Researchers investigated how coagulation process conditions — including coagulant type, pH, and microsand addition — affect the removal of polyethylene, PVC, and textile microfibers from river water, municipal wastewater, laundry effluent, and synthetic matrices. Ferric chloride and polyaluminum chloride both achieved substantial removal, with performance varying significantly by water matrix and microplastic type.

Systematic Review Tier 1

Microplastics removal from aquatic environment by coagulation: Selecting the best coagulant based on variables determined from a systematic review

This systematic review and experimental study identifies the most effective methods for removing microplastics from water using coagulation, a common water treatment technique. Researchers tested different coagulants on three types of microplastics and found that aluminum-based coagulants were most effective. These findings could help water treatment plants better remove microplastics from the water supply before it reaches our taps.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics removal from natural surface water by coagulation process

Researchers compared the effectiveness of ferrous and aluminum sulfate coagulants for removing microplastics from natural surface water, finding that both successfully removed polystyrene and polyvinyl chloride particles. Ferrous sulfate showed slightly higher removal efficiency, and the addition of coagulant aids further improved results. The study demonstrates that conventional coagulation processes already used in drinking water treatment can meaningfully reduce microplastic contamination.

Article Tier 2

Efficiency and mechanism of micro- and nano-plastic removal with polymeric Al-Fe bimetallic coagulants: Role of Fe addition

Researchers investigated polymeric Al-Fe bimetallic coagulants for removing micro- and nanoplastics from drinking water, finding that iron addition enhanced nanoplastic removal efficiency through improved charge neutralization and floc formation mechanisms.

Share this paper