0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Remediation Sign in to save

Selection of a sustainable treatment process for removal of microplastics from wastewater by axiomatic design and PROMETHEE

International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 2025 2 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared multiple water treatment processes for microplastic removal and identified selection criteria for sustainable treatment approaches, finding that coagulation-flocculation, membrane filtration, and biological treatment each offered different trade-offs in cost, efficiency, and byproduct generation.

Study Type Environmental

Abstract Microplastics cause alarming levels of pollution in the receiving water environment. Therefore, various advanced treatment processes are being investigated to prevent microplastics from entering the receiving water environment. In this study, microplastic (MP) treatment processes were evaluated in terms of efficiency, economy, sustainability, and applicability using multi-criteria decision-making methods (MCDM). Fuzzy Axiomatic Design and fuzzy Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) methods were preferred as MCDM. Photocatalytic degradation, membrane filtration, conventional wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), coagulation, adsorption, biological degradation, electrocoagulation, electrooxidation and chemical oxidation alternatives were determined for MP removal. These alternatives were examined with the criteria of MP removal efficiency, operation and maintenance cost, secondary waste generation, required installation space, green process, operating difficulty and industrializability. According to the results of both MCDM methodologies, electrocoagulation was determined as the most suitable MP treatment alternative, while conventional WWTP was the least preferred alternative. Finding that the most suitable and least suitable alternatives were found to be the same in both methodologies showed that the MCDM methodologies used are applicable in solving the current problem. Graphical Abstract

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Hybrid Wastewater Treatment: Efficiency and Challenges in Microplastic Removal

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers reviewed laboratory, pilot, and full-scale evidence for hybrid wastewater treatment configurations — combining membrane bioreactors, coagulation-flocculation, electrocoagulation, ozonation, and advanced filtration — finding near-complete microplastic removal is achievable, though fibers and particles below 100 µm remain the most persistent fraction across all treatment combinations.

Article Tier 2

Treatment technologies for the removal of micro plastics from aqueous medium

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers reviewed treatment technologies for removing microplastics from water, finding that while multiple methods including filtration, membrane processes, and coagulation show promise, their effectiveness depends on microplastic size, type, and concentration.

Article Tier 2

Innovative technologies for removal of micro plastic: A review of recent advances

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers reviewed emerging technologies for removing microplastics from wastewater, covering filtration, coagulation, biological treatment, and other methods used at treatment plants. The review highlights which approaches show the most promise and calls for broader adoption and improved standardization so that microplastics are more consistently captured before they reach rivers, lakes, and oceans.

Article Tier 2

Effectiveness of conventional municipal wastewater treatment plants in microplastics removal: Insights from multiple analytical techniques

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers evaluated the effectiveness of conventional municipal wastewater treatment plants in removing microplastics across multiple treatment stages, finding removal efficiencies of 70–90% but documenting that billions of particles still pass through in final effluent daily.

Article Tier 2

Integrating microplastic management into a broader wastewater decision-making framework. Is activated granular sludge (AGS) a game changer?

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared three wastewater treatment technologies for their ability to remove microplastics: conventional activated sludge, membrane bioreactors, and activated granular sludge. While membrane bioreactors performed best at removing microplastics, activated granular sludge emerged as the most cost-effective option with strong overall environmental performance. The study suggests that integrating microplastic management into wastewater treatment decisions requires balancing removal efficiency against energy use, cost, and environmental impact.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper