0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Organic fertilizer mitigated the oxidative stress of tomato induced by nanoplastics through affecting rhizosphere soil microorganisms and bacteriophage functions

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2025 4 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers investigated whether organic fertilizer could protect tomato plants from the harmful effects of nanoplastics in soil. They found that organic fertilizer reduced oxidative stress in tomato stems by roughly 25-35% compared to chemical fertilizer, primarily by boosting beneficial soil bacteria and bacteriophage activity in the root zone. The study suggests that organic farming practices may help buffer crops against nanoplastic contamination in agricultural soils.

Polymers
Body Systems

Nanoplastics (NPs), which are widely present in agricultural soils, are difficult to remove and are potentially harmful to plant growth and development. However, few studies have focused on how to mitigation the oxidative stress in plants induced by soil NPs exposure. Therefore, in this study, the effects of organic and chemical fertilizers on the oxidative stress of tomato under exposure to polystyrene nanoplastics (PS-NPs) in soil were investigated. Compared with chemical fertilizer under exposure to PS-NPs, the organic fertilizer reduced the reactive oxygen species (ROS) content by 25.63 % and the HO content by 34.58 % in tomato stems, whereas no significant effects were observed with respect to the amount of PS-NP internalized in tomato. Additionally, organic fertilizer increased the accumulation of the phytohormones salicylic acid (SA) and abscisic acid (ABA) by 76.53 % and 22.54 %, respectively, and these factors are key for reducing the ROS and HO contents in stems. In the rhizosphere microbiome of organic fertilizer group under exposure to PS-NPs, enrichment in Actinomycetes and an increased abundance of terpenoids and polyketides metabolism were the main factors affecting the accumulation of ABA and SA. Moreover, bacteriophage activity in the rhizosphere indirectly contributed to the increase in this function. These changes ultimately resulted in a reduction in oxidative stress in tomato stems and protected tomato growth. The results of this study will provide a better understanding of the interaction between plants and nanoplastics in soil and provide a new reference for alleviating the oxidative stress caused by nanoplastics in plants.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Humic Acid Alleviates the Toxicity of Nanoplastics towards Solanum lycopersicum

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers found that humic acid forms an eco-corona around polystyrene nanoplastics that significantly alleviates their toxicity to tomato seedlings, with coronated nanoplastics showing improved germination rates and plant growth compared to bare nanoplastics, suggesting natural organic matter plays a protective role in agricultural soils.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics reshape rhizosphere microbial communities and nutrient cycling in tomato agroecosystems

AI summary Read the abstract

Tiny plastic particles from pollution are seeping into farm soil and disrupting the natural microbes that help tomato plants absorb nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus. This research found that different types of plastic (like those from packaging and pipes) throw off soil chemistry and bacterial activity in ways that could affect how healthy and nutrient-rich our food crops grow. While this study looked at soil, not food safety directly, it adds to growing evidence that microplastic pollution may be quietly affecting the food system from the ground up.

Clinical Trial Tier 1

Climate-resilient tomato production: potassium nanoparticles regulate carbohydrate metabolism and oxidative defense under nanoplastic stress

AI summary Read the abstract

Tomato plants grown in soil with nanoplastics showed reduced growth, less chlorophyll, and more oxidative damage compared to untreated plants. Spraying leaves with potassium nanoparticles reduced these harmful changes, including lower damage markers and higher antioxidant enzyme activity, while also improving growth measures and nutrient levels.

Article Tier 2

Can Rhizosphere Effects Mitigate the Threat from Nanoplastics and Plastic Additives to Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)?

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers investigated whether the rhizosphere, the zone of soil around plant roots, can mitigate the combined threats of nanoplastics and the plastic additive DEHP to tomato plants. The study found that while the rhizosphere provided some protective effects against soil contamination, the coexistence of nanoplastics and DEHP actually increased risks to food safety compared to DEHP alone, indicating that plastic pollution compounds the threat from plastic additives.

Article Tier 2

Biodegradable microplastics affect tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) growth by interfering rhizosphere key phylotypes

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists found that biodegradable microplastics, often promoted as eco-friendly alternatives, can negatively affect tomato plant growth by disrupting beneficial soil bacteria around the roots. This suggests that even plastics designed to break down in the environment may still pose risks to agriculture and food production as they degrade into microplastic fragments.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper