We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Quantification of the Uptake and Biodistribution of Nanoplastics in Escherichia coli
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed a novel method combining lysozyme treatment with pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry to distinguish between nanoplastics that penetrate bacterial cells and those that adhere to cell surfaces. The study found that only about 10% of nanoplastics actually entered E. coli cells, while the majority (37-64%) adhered to the cell wall, providing new quantitative insight into how nanoplastics interact with bacteria.
Nanoplastics (NPs) are prevalent in the environment, posing risks to ecosystems and human health. While research into their effects on bacterial activity has increased, the mechanisms underlying NP-bacteria interactions─specifically whether NPs penetrate cells or adhere to the cell surface─remain poorly understood. This knowledge gap largely stems from the absence of quantitative analytical methods. Herein, we developed a novel approach combining lysozyme treatment with pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) to differentiate between intracellular and cell wall-bound NPs in Escherichia coli (E. coli) quantitatively. The method involves selective removal of the bacterial cell wall using lysozyme, protein corona-induced extraction to enrich cell wall-bound NPs, and hydrogen peroxide digestion to eliminate protoplast interference before Py-GC/MS analysis. Validation with europium (Eu)-labeled NPs, quantified by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), confirmed the method's accuracy and reliability. Using this approach, we found that after NP exposure, only a small fraction (9.6-10.5%) of NPs penetrated E. coli cells, while the majority (36.9-63.8%) adhered to the cell surface. Transmission electron microscopy further corroborated these findings. Consequently, this work provides a robust tool for the quantification of NP uptake and biodistribution in bacterial systems, advancing our understanding of NP-microorganism interactions and their environmental implications.
More Papers Like This
Quantification of the Uptake and Biodistribution ofNanoplastics in Escherichia coli
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers quantified the uptake and biodistribution of fluorescently labeled nanoplastics in Escherichia coli, finding that bacteria actively accumulated nanoplastic particles with distribution patterns dependent on particle surface charge and bacterial growth phase.
Interfacial Interactions between Escherichia coli and Polystyrene Nanoplastics: a Physicochemical Perspective
AI summary Read the abstract
When nanoplastic particles encounter bacteria in the environment, the nature of that interaction affects how plastics move through ecosystems and whether they carry pathogens. This study examined how polystyrene nanoparticles (both plain and amine-modified) interact with E. coli at a physicochemical level, finding that attachment depended strongly on particle surface charge, pH, and concentration. The amine-modified particles bound more readily to bacterial surfaces and altered bacterial membranes, suggesting that surface chemistry—which changes as plastics weather in the environment—substantially influences the ecological behavior of nanoplastics and their potential to ferry microorganisms to new locations.
Quantifying nanoplastic cellular interactions and uptake pathways by label-free plasmonic imaging
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists used a special microscope technique to watch, in real time, exactly how tiny plastic particles (nanoplastics) get into human cells — finding that the vast majority (over 85%) are actively pulled inside by the cell itself, rather than just passively slipping in or sticking to the surface. This matters because understanding *how* nanoplastics enter our cells is a critical first step toward figuring out whether — and how — they might cause harm, especially as these particles are increasingly found in our food, water, and even bodies.
Cellular internalization pathways of environmentally exposed microplastic particles: Phagocytosis or macropinocytosis?
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated the cellular internalization pathways of environmentally exposed microplastic particles, examining whether phagocytosis or macropinocytosis is the dominant uptake mechanism and how the eco-corona of adsorbed proteins on MP surfaces influences cell-particle interactions.
Distinct lipid membrane interaction and uptake of differentially charged nanoplastics in bacteria
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers studied how nanoplastics with different surface charges interact with bacterial cell membranes, finding that positively charged particles penetrate bacteria far more effectively than neutral or negatively charged ones. The positively charged nanoplastics caused more cellular stress by generating reactive oxygen species and damaged cell structures differently depending on the bacterial type. These findings are important for understanding how nanoplastics may affect both environmental bacteria and the human microbiome.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.