0
Review Tier 2 Sign in to save

Mapping the biological effects of micro- and nanoplastics in mammalian intestinal models: a scoping review.

AI summary Read the abstract

This review summarizes 90 studies on how tiny plastic particles affect gut health, mostly using lab-grown human intestinal cells rather than live animals. Most research used one plastic type (polystyrene) and nanosized particles, finding effects like cell stress, inflammation, and disruption of the gut's protective barrier.

Polymers
Models
Study Type Human

BACKGROUND: Micro- and nanoplastics (MNPLs) are increasingly recognized as emerging environmental contaminants with potential implications for gastrointestinal health. Although experimental research on intestinal MNPL toxicity has expanded rapidly, the available evidence remains highly heterogeneous with respect to experimental models, polymer composition, particle size, particle condition, exposure scenarios, and biological endpoints. Therefore, a structured evidence map is needed to clarify dominant methodological patterns and identify key knowledge gaps in the field. METHODS: This study was conducted as a scoping review in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute framework and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify eligible original in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo experimental research investigating the biological effects of MNPLs in mammalian intestinal models. Data were extracted and synthesized based on experimental models, particle characteristics, exposure scenarios, and toxicological outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 90 peer-reviewed studies were included from 3,540 initially identified records. The evidence base was strongly dominated by simplified experimental systems, with in vitro studies accounting for 88.9% of the included studies (n = 80/90). Caco-2-based systems represented the dominant experimental platform overall (52.2%, n = 47/90), while Caco-2 monoculture-like models accounted for 36.7% (n = 33/90). A pronounced polymer bias was observed, with polystyrene (PS) appearing in 60.0% of the included studies (n = 54/90). Nanoplastics were the most frequently investigated size category (60.0%, n = 54/90), and most studies relied on virgin particles (68.9%, n = 62/90). Across the literature, the most prominent evidence themes included oxidative stress and mitochondrial injury, uptake and translocation, barrier dysfunction and permeability changes, inflammation and immune signaling, and cell death- or DNA damage-related responses. CONCLUSION: This scoping review demonstrates that intestinal MNPL research has expanded rapidly but remains methodologically concentrated in simplified in vitro systems and dominated by a limited range of polymer types and particle conditions. Although existing studies have generated important mechanistic insights, future progress will depend on the broader use of physiologically representative intestinal models, environmentally relevant polymers, and more standardized physicochemical characterization protocols. These findings provide a structured evidence map to support more realistic and translationally relevant future studies. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

More Papers Like This

Systematic Review Tier 1

Effect of microplastics and nanoplastics in gastrointestinal tract on gut health: A systematic review.

AI summary Read the abstract

This systematic review of 30 in vitro studies found that microplastics and nanoplastics cause size- and concentration-dependent damage to human gastrointestinal cells, including increased oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation, and apoptosis. Smaller particles consistently showed greater cellular uptake and biological effects, though chronic low-dose exposure generally produced minimal impacts.

Systematic Review Tier 1

Effect of microplastics and nanoplastics in gastrointestinal tract on gut health: A systematic review.

AI summary Read the abstract

This systematic review provides the first comprehensive look at how microplastics and nanoplastics affect the human gut using laboratory models. The findings help explain how these tiny particles may damage the digestive tract lining and trigger inflammation, which is important for understanding the health risks of swallowing microplastics in food and water.

Article Tier 2

Micro(nano)plastics and Their Potential Impact on Human Gut Health: A Narrative Review

AI summary Read the abstract

This review summarizes research on how micro- and nanoplastics affect the gut, finding that they can damage the intestinal lining, trigger immune responses, and disrupt the balance of beneficial gut bacteria in both cell studies and animal models. Since humans are primarily exposed to microplastics through food and food packaging, understanding these gut effects is essential for assessing the true health risks of plastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

Biological effects of polystyrene micro- and nano-plastics on human intestinal organoid-derived epithelial tissue models without and with M cells.

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed human intestinal organoid-derived epithelial tissue models with and without M cells to polystyrene micro- and nano-plastics, finding that nano-plastics caused greater disruption of barrier integrity and uptake than micro-plastics, and that M cell-containing models showed enhanced particle translocation compared to standard epithelial models.

Article Tier 2

Micro‐ and nanoplastics in gastrointestinal disorders: Mapping the translational gap between exposure, biomonitoring, and pathogenic mechanisms

AI summary Read the abstract

Tiny plastic particles from our food, air, and water may be doing more than just passing through our bodies, this review of existing research suggests they can irritate the gut lining, trigger inflammation, and throw off the balance of healthy gut bacteria. While scientists haven't yet nailed down exactly how much exposure causes harm or the precise mechanisms involved, the evidence so far suggests these ever-present plastic particles could be a hidden contributor to digestive health problems, making it a research area worth watching.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper